Difference between revisions of "Fasulo2021"
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
|Language=English | |Language=English | ||
|Chapter=3 | |Chapter=3 | ||
| + | |Address=Amsterdam | ||
|Booktitle=Language and Social Interaction at Home and School | |Booktitle=Language and Social Interaction at Home and School | ||
|Pages=121–152 | |Pages=121–152 | ||
Latest revision as of 01:08, 6 August 2023
| Fasulo2021 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | INCOLLECTION |
| Key | Fasulo2021 |
| Author(s) | Alessandra Fasulo |
| Title | Talking to children with atypical development: a study on the practice of asking ‘Are you going to’ questions |
| Editor(s) | Letizia Caronia |
| Tag(s) | action solicits, Down Syndrome, Atypical interaction, Action Formation, Are you going to questions |
| Publisher | John Benjamins |
| Year | 2021 |
| Language | English |
| City | Amsterdam |
| Month | |
| Journal | |
| Volume | |
| Number | |
| Pages | 121–152 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1075/ds.32.03fas |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | Dialogue Studies 32 |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | Language and Social Interaction at Home and School |
| Chapter | 3 |
Abstract
Interactional studies of children with language impairments and their habitual interlocutors are key to understanding reciprocal adaptations in communication. The chapter is based on video recorded observations of three families at home, each with a child with Down Syndrome of approximately 6 years of age. The analysis focuses on the parental practice of asking the children ‘Are you going to’ questions. The results document two main uses: ‘request for information’ and ‘action solicit’. The analysis suggests that using the question as action solicit may hamper children’s comprehension and undermine their agency. A comparison with other action solicits and relative frequencies of use suggests family styles that either privilege a Requester’s Perspective or the Child’s Perspective. It is argued that, by privileging the Child’s Perspective, parents limit the imposition on children but subtract potential for normative and epistemic socialisation, as well as opportunities for the child to display their collaboration.
Notes
