Difference between revisions of "Pomerantz1990"
SaulAlbert (talk | contribs) |
|||
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
|Author(s)=Anita Pomerantz | |Author(s)=Anita Pomerantz | ||
|Title=Conversation analytic claims | |Title=Conversation analytic claims | ||
− | |Tag(s)=Basic Resources; | + | |Tag(s)=Basic Resources; Conversation Analysis; |
|Key=Pomerantz1990 | |Key=Pomerantz1990 | ||
|Year=1990 | |Year=1990 | ||
+ | |Language=English | ||
|Journal=Communication Monographs | |Journal=Communication Monographs | ||
|Volume=57 | |Volume=57 | ||
− | |Pages= | + | |Number=3 |
+ | |Pages=231–235 | ||
+ | |URL=http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/03637759009376198 | ||
+ | |DOI=10.1080/03637759009376198 | ||
|Note=This is cited widely as "Chautauqua: On the validity and generalizability of conversational analysis methods", although looking at the on-line edition, this seems to be a misattribution of the section title that includes a number of articles including Pomerantz': http://www.tandfonline.com/toc/rcmm20/57/3#.VIROCFRJXUY | |Note=This is cited widely as "Chautauqua: On the validity and generalizability of conversational analysis methods", although looking at the on-line edition, this seems to be a misattribution of the section title that includes a number of articles including Pomerantz': http://www.tandfonline.com/toc/rcmm20/57/3#.VIROCFRJXUY | ||
}} | }} |
Latest revision as of 06:02, 31 May 2018
Pomerantz1990 | |
---|---|
BibType | ARTICLE |
Key | Pomerantz1990 |
Author(s) | Anita Pomerantz |
Title | Conversation analytic claims |
Editor(s) | |
Tag(s) | Basic Resources, Conversation Analysis |
Publisher | |
Year | 1990 |
Language | English |
City | |
Month | |
Journal | Communication Monographs |
Volume | 57 |
Number | 3 |
Pages | 231–235 |
URL | Link |
DOI | 10.1080/03637759009376198 |
ISBN | |
Organization | |
Institution | |
School | |
Type | |
Edition | |
Series | |
Howpublished | |
Book title | |
Chapter |
Abstract
Notes
This is cited widely as "Chautauqua: On the validity and generalizability of conversational analysis methods", although looking at the on-line edition, this seems to be a misattribution of the section title that includes a number of articles including Pomerantz': http://www.tandfonline.com/toc/rcmm20/57/3#.VIROCFRJXUY