Difference between revisions of "Tadic2024"
SaulAlbert (talk | contribs) (BibTeX auto import 2023-02-20 07:59:40) |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{BibEntry | {{BibEntry | ||
| − | | | + | |BibType=ARTICLE |
| − | | | + | |Author(s)=Nadja Tadic; |
|Title=Preference organization and possible -isms in institutional interaction: The case of adult second language classrooms | |Title=Preference organization and possible -isms in institutional interaction: The case of adult second language classrooms | ||
| − | + | |Tag(s)=EMCA; isms; racism; classism; sexism; preference organization; preference; MCA; Membership Categorization | |
| − | |Tag(s)=EMCA; isms; racism; classism; sexism; preference organization; preference; MCA; Membership Categorization | + | |Key=Tadic2024 |
| − | | | + | |Year=2024 |
| − | |Year= | ||
| − | |||
|Journal=Language in Society | |Journal=Language in Society | ||
| − | |Pages= | + | |Volume=53 |
| + | |Number=2 | ||
| + | |Pages=211–237 | ||
|URL=https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/language-in-society/article/preference-organization-and-possible-isms-in-institutional-interaction-the-case-of-adult-second-language-classrooms/CEB576C0AFB4BB3C434517A3A0A1DC5C | |URL=https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/language-in-society/article/preference-organization-and-possible-isms-in-institutional-interaction-the-case-of-adult-second-language-classrooms/CEB576C0AFB4BB3C434517A3A0A1DC5C | ||
|DOI=10.1017/S0047404523000015 | |DOI=10.1017/S0047404523000015 | ||
| − | |||
|Abstract=This study examines preference organization in adult second language classrooms in relation to possible -isms—utterances which are hearably racist, classist, (hetero)sexist, or otherwise exclusionary, although their exclusionary nature may be (re)negotiated in situ. A collection of sixty-one possible -isms from a corpus of fifty-five hours of video-recorded English second language classes was examined using conversation analysis and membership categorization analysis. The analysis shows that participants orient to solidarity by supporting -isms, progressivity by deleting -isms, and moral accountability by challenging -isms; however, participants prioritize solidarity, enacting it early, even in cases of deletion and challenges. I argue that this preference organization is rooted in the institutional roles and objectives of adult second language classrooms, where presumably competent members of diverse cultures aim to foster an environment for active participation. Findings underscore the importance of conducting microanalyses of talk-in-interaction to uncover structural constraints which facilitate the reproduction of systemic exclusion. (-isms, preference, conversation analysis, membership categorization analysis, classroom interaction, exclusion in interaction)* | |Abstract=This study examines preference organization in adult second language classrooms in relation to possible -isms—utterances which are hearably racist, classist, (hetero)sexist, or otherwise exclusionary, although their exclusionary nature may be (re)negotiated in situ. A collection of sixty-one possible -isms from a corpus of fifty-five hours of video-recorded English second language classes was examined using conversation analysis and membership categorization analysis. The analysis shows that participants orient to solidarity by supporting -isms, progressivity by deleting -isms, and moral accountability by challenging -isms; however, participants prioritize solidarity, enacting it early, even in cases of deletion and challenges. I argue that this preference organization is rooted in the institutional roles and objectives of adult second language classrooms, where presumably competent members of diverse cultures aim to foster an environment for active participation. Findings underscore the importance of conducting microanalyses of talk-in-interaction to uncover structural constraints which facilitate the reproduction of systemic exclusion. (-isms, preference, conversation analysis, membership categorization analysis, classroom interaction, exclusion in interaction)* | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 00:26, 19 April 2024
| Tadic2024 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Tadic2024 |
| Author(s) | Nadja Tadic |
| Title | Preference organization and possible -isms in institutional interaction: The case of adult second language classrooms |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, isms, racism, classism, sexism, preference organization, preference, MCA, Membership Categorization |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2024 |
| Language | |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Language in Society |
| Volume | 53 |
| Number | 2 |
| Pages | 211–237 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1017/S0047404523000015 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
This study examines preference organization in adult second language classrooms in relation to possible -isms—utterances which are hearably racist, classist, (hetero)sexist, or otherwise exclusionary, although their exclusionary nature may be (re)negotiated in situ. A collection of sixty-one possible -isms from a corpus of fifty-five hours of video-recorded English second language classes was examined using conversation analysis and membership categorization analysis. The analysis shows that participants orient to solidarity by supporting -isms, progressivity by deleting -isms, and moral accountability by challenging -isms; however, participants prioritize solidarity, enacting it early, even in cases of deletion and challenges. I argue that this preference organization is rooted in the institutional roles and objectives of adult second language classrooms, where presumably competent members of diverse cultures aim to foster an environment for active participation. Findings underscore the importance of conducting microanalyses of talk-in-interaction to uncover structural constraints which facilitate the reproduction of systemic exclusion. (-isms, preference, conversation analysis, membership categorization analysis, classroom interaction, exclusion in interaction)*
Notes
