Difference between revisions of "Reddington2021"
HansunWaring (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Elizabeth Reddington, Ignasi Clemente, Hansun Zhang Waring, and Di Yu |Title="Dong being collegial"" Participants' positioning work in Q...") |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) m (AndreiKorbut moved page Reddington-Clemente-Waring-Yu to Reddington2021 without leaving a redirect) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{BibEntry | {{BibEntry | ||
| − | |BibType= | + | |BibType=INCOLLECTION |
| − | |Author(s)=Elizabeth Reddington | + | |Author(s)=Elizabeth Reddington; Ignasi Clemente; Hansun Zhang Waring; Di Yu |
| − | |Title= | + | |Title=“Dong being collegial”: participants’ positioning work in Q&A sessions |
| − | |Editor(s)= | + | |Editor(s)=Cornelia Ilie |
|Tag(s)=EMCA; identity; collegiality; academic identity; institutional interaction | |Tag(s)=EMCA; identity; collegiality; academic identity; institutional interaction | ||
| − | |Key= | + | |Key=Reddington2021 |
|Publisher=John Benjamins | |Publisher=John Benjamins | ||
|Year=2021 | |Year=2021 | ||
|Language=English | |Language=English | ||
| − | | | + | |Address=Amsterdam |
| − | |Booktitle=Questioning | + | |Booktitle=Questioning and Answering Practices across Contexts and Cultures |
| − | |Pages= | + | |Pages=257–284 |
| − | |Abstract= | + | |URL=https://benjamins.com/catalog/pbns.323.09red |
| + | |DOI=10.1075/pbns.323.09red | ||
| + | |Abstract=This chapter applies conversation analysis to investigate questioning and responding practices in the understudied context of post-presentation question-and-answer (Q&A) sessions. Participants include speakers who represent a U.S. philanthropic foundation and audiences interested in health issues. Examining a corpus of question-answer sequences from four video-recorded Q&A sessions, we find that participants routinely use their multi-unit questioning and responding turns to minimize asymmetry, positioning themselves and their interlocutors as peers with shared concerns. By documenting how presenters and audience members “do collegiality” through questioning and responding practices, the study contributes to research on question-answer sequences in institutional settings, revealing a complex interactional context in which participants work to blur the line between “expert” and “layperson” identities. | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 04:08, 23 December 2023
| Reddington2021 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | INCOLLECTION |
| Key | Reddington2021 |
| Author(s) | Elizabeth Reddington, Ignasi Clemente, Hansun Zhang Waring, Di Yu |
| Title | “Dong being collegial”: participants’ positioning work in Q&A sessions |
| Editor(s) | Cornelia Ilie |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, identity, collegiality, academic identity, institutional interaction |
| Publisher | John Benjamins |
| Year | 2021 |
| Language | English |
| City | Amsterdam |
| Month | |
| Journal | |
| Volume | |
| Number | |
| Pages | 257–284 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1075/pbns.323.09red |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | Questioning and Answering Practices across Contexts and Cultures |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
This chapter applies conversation analysis to investigate questioning and responding practices in the understudied context of post-presentation question-and-answer (Q&A) sessions. Participants include speakers who represent a U.S. philanthropic foundation and audiences interested in health issues. Examining a corpus of question-answer sequences from four video-recorded Q&A sessions, we find that participants routinely use their multi-unit questioning and responding turns to minimize asymmetry, positioning themselves and their interlocutors as peers with shared concerns. By documenting how presenters and audience members “do collegiality” through questioning and responding practices, the study contributes to research on question-answer sequences in institutional settings, revealing a complex interactional context in which participants work to blur the line between “expert” and “layperson” identities.
Notes
