Difference between revisions of "Mlynar2022c"
JakubMlynar (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Jakub Mlynář; |Title=Harold Garfinkel and Edward Rose in the early years of ethnomethodology |Tag(s)=EMCA; Harold Garfinkel; Edward Ro...") |
JakubMlynar (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
|Author(s)=Jakub Mlynář; | |Author(s)=Jakub Mlynář; | ||
|Title=Harold Garfinkel and Edward Rose in the early years of ethnomethodology | |Title=Harold Garfinkel and Edward Rose in the early years of ethnomethodology | ||
| − | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Harold Garfinkel; Edward Rose; ethnomethodology; anthropology; ethnography; ethno-inquiries; Harvey Sacks; Egon Bittner; common sense; small languages; sociology | + | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Harold Garfinkel; Edward Rose; ethnomethodology; anthropology; ethnography; ethno-inquiries; Harvey Sacks; Egon Bittner; common sense; small languages; sociology |
|Key=Mlynar2022c | |Key=Mlynar2022c | ||
| − | |Year= | + | |Year=2023 |
|Language=English | |Language=English | ||
|Journal=Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences | |Journal=Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences | ||
| + | |Volume=59 | ||
| + | |Number=2 | ||
| + | |Pages=171-192 | ||
|URL=https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jhbs.22237 | |URL=https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jhbs.22237 | ||
|DOI=10.1002/jhbs.22237 | |DOI=10.1002/jhbs.22237 | ||
|Abstract=This article documents the beginning of the intellectual companionship between the founder of ethnomethodology, Harold Garfinkel, and Edward Rose, who is most often associated with his program of “ethno-inquiries.” I present results from archival research focusing on the contacts and collaborations between Rose and Garfinkel in the years 1955–1965. First, I describe the review process for Rose and Felton's paper, submitted to the American Sociological Review in 1955, which Garfinkel reviewed and after Rose's rebuttal recommended for publication. The paper induced Garfinkel to write an extensive commentary that has remained unpublished. Second, I discuss the 1958 New Mexico conference sponsored by the Air Force, which was an opportunity for Rose and Garfinkel to work together on topics related to common-sense knowledge and scientific knowledge. Third, I give an overview of the ethnomethodological conferences in 1962 and 1963, supported by an Air Force grant written collaboratively by Rose and Garfinkel. Here I focus primarily on Rose's research on “small languages,” which stimulated many discussions among the early ethnomethodologists. Rose's work and exchanges with Garfinkel demonstrate the former's affinity for miniaturization as a research approach and search for ways to empiricize topics of sociological theory in locally observable settings. | |Abstract=This article documents the beginning of the intellectual companionship between the founder of ethnomethodology, Harold Garfinkel, and Edward Rose, who is most often associated with his program of “ethno-inquiries.” I present results from archival research focusing on the contacts and collaborations between Rose and Garfinkel in the years 1955–1965. First, I describe the review process for Rose and Felton's paper, submitted to the American Sociological Review in 1955, which Garfinkel reviewed and after Rose's rebuttal recommended for publication. The paper induced Garfinkel to write an extensive commentary that has remained unpublished. Second, I discuss the 1958 New Mexico conference sponsored by the Air Force, which was an opportunity for Rose and Garfinkel to work together on topics related to common-sense knowledge and scientific knowledge. Third, I give an overview of the ethnomethodological conferences in 1962 and 1963, supported by an Air Force grant written collaboratively by Rose and Garfinkel. Here I focus primarily on Rose's research on “small languages,” which stimulated many discussions among the early ethnomethodologists. Rose's work and exchanges with Garfinkel demonstrate the former's affinity for miniaturization as a research approach and search for ways to empiricize topics of sociological theory in locally observable settings. | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 04:39, 14 April 2023
| Mlynar2022c | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Mlynar2022c |
| Author(s) | Jakub Mlynář |
| Title | Harold Garfinkel and Edward Rose in the early years of ethnomethodology |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, Harold Garfinkel, Edward Rose, ethnomethodology, anthropology, ethnography, ethno-inquiries, Harvey Sacks, Egon Bittner, common sense, small languages, sociology |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2023 |
| Language | English |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences |
| Volume | 59 |
| Number | 2 |
| Pages | 171-192 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1002/jhbs.22237 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
This article documents the beginning of the intellectual companionship between the founder of ethnomethodology, Harold Garfinkel, and Edward Rose, who is most often associated with his program of “ethno-inquiries.” I present results from archival research focusing on the contacts and collaborations between Rose and Garfinkel in the years 1955–1965. First, I describe the review process for Rose and Felton's paper, submitted to the American Sociological Review in 1955, which Garfinkel reviewed and after Rose's rebuttal recommended for publication. The paper induced Garfinkel to write an extensive commentary that has remained unpublished. Second, I discuss the 1958 New Mexico conference sponsored by the Air Force, which was an opportunity for Rose and Garfinkel to work together on topics related to common-sense knowledge and scientific knowledge. Third, I give an overview of the ethnomethodological conferences in 1962 and 1963, supported by an Air Force grant written collaboratively by Rose and Garfinkel. Here I focus primarily on Rose's research on “small languages,” which stimulated many discussions among the early ethnomethodologists. Rose's work and exchanges with Garfinkel demonstrate the former's affinity for miniaturization as a research approach and search for ways to empiricize topics of sociological theory in locally observable settings.
Notes
