Difference between revisions of "Groeber-Pochon-Berger2014"
PaultenHave (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Simone Groeber; Evelyne Pochon-Berger; |Title=Turns and turn-taking in sign language interaction: A study of turn-final holds |Tag(s)=EM...") |
PaultenHave (talk | contribs) m |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
|Author(s)=Simone Groeber; Evelyne Pochon-Berger; | |Author(s)=Simone Groeber; Evelyne Pochon-Berger; | ||
|Title=Turns and turn-taking in sign language interaction: A study of turn-final holds | |Title=Turns and turn-taking in sign language interaction: A study of turn-final holds | ||
| − | |Tag(s)=EMCA; | + | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Conversation Analysis; Turn-taking; Sign language interactions; Holds; Swiss German Sign Language |
|Key=Groeber-Pochon-Berger2014 | |Key=Groeber-Pochon-Berger2014 | ||
|Year=2014 | |Year=2014 | ||
|Journal=Journal of Pragmatics | |Journal=Journal of Pragmatics | ||
|Volume=65 | |Volume=65 | ||
| − | |Pages= | + | |Pages=121–136 |
| + | |URL=http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378216613002026 | ||
| + | |DOI=10.1016/j.pragma.2013.08.012 | ||
| + | |Abstract=This article examines a recurrent phenomenon in sign language interaction: the freezing of a sign, called a ‘hold’, in turn-final position. This phenomenon is traditionally described as a prosodic feature that contributes to the rhythm of signed talk and to the marking of syntactic boundaries, hence not adding any propositional content on its own. A detailed observation of these holds in naturally occurring conversational data, however, raises the following questions: What is the relevance of such holds in the management of turn-taking? What meaningful social action do they accomplish? Based on 90 min of video-recordings of Swiss German Sign Language (DSGS) interaction within an institutional setting, we undertake micro-sequential and multimodal analyses yielding the following findings (1) turn-final holds occur recurrently in turns that set a strong action projection (e.g. questions), (2) they embody the current speaker's expectations regarding next actions; and therefore (3) their release is finely tuned to the recognizability of the relevant and expected next action in progress. | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 05:35, 7 October 2016
| Groeber-Pochon-Berger2014 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Groeber-Pochon-Berger2014 |
| Author(s) | Simone Groeber, Evelyne Pochon-Berger |
| Title | Turns and turn-taking in sign language interaction: A study of turn-final holds |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, Conversation Analysis, Turn-taking, Sign language interactions, Holds, Swiss German Sign Language |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2014 |
| Language | |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Journal of Pragmatics |
| Volume | 65 |
| Number | |
| Pages | 121–136 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.pragma.2013.08.012 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
This article examines a recurrent phenomenon in sign language interaction: the freezing of a sign, called a ‘hold’, in turn-final position. This phenomenon is traditionally described as a prosodic feature that contributes to the rhythm of signed talk and to the marking of syntactic boundaries, hence not adding any propositional content on its own. A detailed observation of these holds in naturally occurring conversational data, however, raises the following questions: What is the relevance of such holds in the management of turn-taking? What meaningful social action do they accomplish? Based on 90 min of video-recordings of Swiss German Sign Language (DSGS) interaction within an institutional setting, we undertake micro-sequential and multimodal analyses yielding the following findings (1) turn-final holds occur recurrently in turns that set a strong action projection (e.g. questions), (2) they embody the current speaker's expectations regarding next actions; and therefore (3) their release is finely tuned to the recognizability of the relevant and expected next action in progress.
Notes
