Difference between revisions of "McHoul1981"
PaultenHave (talk | contribs) |
JakubMlynar (talk | contribs) m (name correction) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{BibEntry | {{BibEntry | ||
|BibType=ARTICLE | |BibType=ARTICLE | ||
| − | |Author(s)= | + | |Author(s)=Alec McHoul; |
|Title=Ethnomethodology and the position of relativist discourse | |Title=Ethnomethodology and the position of relativist discourse | ||
|Tag(s)=EMCA; Ethnomethodology; | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Ethnomethodology; | ||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
|Number=2 | |Number=2 | ||
|Pages=107–124 | |Pages=107–124 | ||
| − | |Abstract=The paper works through the topic of ‘theorising’ as it has been treated in ethnomethodology. It is concerned to show (a) that the topic has a somewhat equivocal status within that discourse; (b) that some recent self-critical moves in ethnomethodology which have been touched off by considering these problems constitute no more than further uncritical repetitions of that discourse; (c) that ethnomethodology’s critics have been concentrating unnecessarily upon its supposed ‘idealism’ and have missed a central trouble: that ethnomethodology is an overly realist form of social scientific work. | + | |URL=https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1468-5914.1981.tb00028.x |
| − | + | |DOI=10.1111/j.1468-5914.1981.tb00028.x | |
| + | |Abstract=The paper works through the topic of ‘theorising’ as it has been treated in ethnomethodology. It is concerned to show (a) that the topic has a somewhat equivocal status within that discourse; (b) that some recent self-critical moves in ethnomethodology which have been touched off by considering these problems constitute no more than further uncritical repetitions of that discourse; (c) that ethnomethodology’s critics have been concentrating unnecessarily upon its supposed ‘idealism’ and have missed a central trouble: that ethnomethodology is an overly realist form of social scientific work. | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 05:23, 17 April 2020
| McHoul1981 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | McHoul1981 |
| Author(s) | Alec McHoul |
| Title | Ethnomethodology and the position of relativist discourse |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, Ethnomethodology |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 1981 |
| Language | |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour |
| Volume | 11 |
| Number | 2 |
| Pages | 107–124 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1111/j.1468-5914.1981.tb00028.x |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
The paper works through the topic of ‘theorising’ as it has been treated in ethnomethodology. It is concerned to show (a) that the topic has a somewhat equivocal status within that discourse; (b) that some recent self-critical moves in ethnomethodology which have been touched off by considering these problems constitute no more than further uncritical repetitions of that discourse; (c) that ethnomethodology’s critics have been concentrating unnecessarily upon its supposed ‘idealism’ and have missed a central trouble: that ethnomethodology is an overly realist form of social scientific work.
Notes
