Difference between revisions of "Krummheuer2020a"
SaulAlbert (talk | contribs) |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{BibEntry | {{BibEntry | ||
|BibType=INPROCEEDINGS | |BibType=INPROCEEDINGS | ||
| − | |Author(s)=Antonia Krummheuer; Matthias Rehm; Kasper Rodil; | + | |Author(s)=Antonia Lina Krummheuer; Matthias Rehm; Kasper Rodil; |
| − | |Title=Triadic Human-Robot Interaction | + | |Title=Triadic Human-Robot Interaction: Distributed Agency and Memory in Robot Assisted Interactions |
|Tag(s)=Brain injury;Ethnomethodology;Memory aid;Multimodal interaction analysis; Reminder robot; HRI; Robot; EMCA; AI reference list | |Tag(s)=Brain injury;Ethnomethodology;Memory aid;Multimodal interaction analysis; Reminder robot; HRI; Robot; EMCA; AI reference list | ||
|Key=Krummheuer2020a | |Key=Krummheuer2020a | ||
|Publisher=Association for Computing Machinery | |Publisher=Association for Computing Machinery | ||
|Year=2020 | |Year=2020 | ||
| + | |Language=English | ||
|Address=New York, NY, USA | |Address=New York, NY, USA | ||
| − | |||
|Booktitle=Companion of the 2020 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction | |Booktitle=Companion of the 2020 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction | ||
|Pages=317–319 | |Pages=317–319 | ||
| + | |URL=https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3371382.3378269 | ||
|DOI=10.1145/3371382.3378269 | |DOI=10.1145/3371382.3378269 | ||
|ISBN=978-1-4503-7057-8 | |ISBN=978-1-4503-7057-8 | ||
| − | |Series=HRI '20 | + | |Series=HRI'20 |
|Abstract=We argue that the field of human-robot interaction needs a distributed and socially situated understanding of reminding and scheduling practices in the design of robots to meet the needs of people with cognitive disabilities. The results are based on an interaction analysis of video recorded workshop interactions during a co-creation process in which the participants tested a reminder-robot prototype that was designed for and with people with acquired brain injury. | |Abstract=We argue that the field of human-robot interaction needs a distributed and socially situated understanding of reminding and scheduling practices in the design of robots to meet the needs of people with cognitive disabilities. The results are based on an interaction analysis of video recorded workshop interactions during a co-creation process in which the participants tested a reminder-robot prototype that was designed for and with people with acquired brain injury. | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 10:55, 24 November 2022
| Krummheuer2020a | |
|---|---|
| BibType | INPROCEEDINGS |
| Key | Krummheuer2020a |
| Author(s) | Antonia Lina Krummheuer, Matthias Rehm, Kasper Rodil |
| Title | Triadic Human-Robot Interaction: Distributed Agency and Memory in Robot Assisted Interactions |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | Brain injury, Ethnomethodology, Memory aid, Multimodal interaction analysis, Reminder robot, HRI, Robot, EMCA, AI reference list |
| Publisher | Association for Computing Machinery |
| Year | 2020 |
| Language | English |
| City | New York, NY, USA |
| Month | |
| Journal | |
| Volume | |
| Number | |
| Pages | 317–319 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1145/3371382.3378269 |
| ISBN | 978-1-4503-7057-8 |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | HRI'20 |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | Companion of the 2020 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
We argue that the field of human-robot interaction needs a distributed and socially situated understanding of reminding and scheduling practices in the design of robots to meet the needs of people with cognitive disabilities. The results are based on an interaction analysis of video recorded workshop interactions during a co-creation process in which the participants tested a reminder-robot prototype that was designed for and with people with acquired brain injury.
Notes
