Difference between revisions of "Porcheron2020"
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
|Year=2020 | |Year=2020 | ||
|Address=New York, NY, USA | |Address=New York, NY, USA | ||
| − | + | |Journal=Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction | |
| − | |Journal= | ||
|Volume=4 | |Volume=4 | ||
|Number=CSCW3 | |Number=CSCW3 | ||
| + | |URL=https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3432942 | ||
|DOI=10.1145/3432942 | |DOI=10.1145/3432942 | ||
|Abstract=The Wizard of Oz method is an increasingly common practice in HCI and CSCW studies as part of iterative design processes for interactive systems. Instead of designing a fully-fledged system, the `technical work' of key system components is completed by human operators yet presented to study participants as if computed by a machine. Yet, little is known about how Wizard of Oz studies are interactionally and collaboratively achieved in situ by researchers and participants. By adopting ethnomethodological perspective, we analyse our use of the method in studies with a voice-controlled vacuum robot \changeand two researchers present. We present data that reveals the work of how such studies are organised and presented to participants and unpack the coordinated orchestration work that unfolds `behind the scenes' to complete the study. We examine how the researchers attend to participant requests and technical breakdowns, and discuss the performative, collaborative, and methodological nature of their work. We conclude by offering insights from our application of the approach to others in the HCI and CSCW communities for applying the method. | |Abstract=The Wizard of Oz method is an increasingly common practice in HCI and CSCW studies as part of iterative design processes for interactive systems. Instead of designing a fully-fledged system, the `technical work' of key system components is completed by human operators yet presented to study participants as if computed by a machine. Yet, little is known about how Wizard of Oz studies are interactionally and collaboratively achieved in situ by researchers and participants. By adopting ethnomethodological perspective, we analyse our use of the method in studies with a voice-controlled vacuum robot \changeand two researchers present. We present data that reveals the work of how such studies are organised and presented to participants and unpack the coordinated orchestration work that unfolds `behind the scenes' to complete the study. We examine how the researchers attend to participant requests and technical breakdowns, and discuss the performative, collaborative, and methodological nature of their work. We conclude by offering insights from our application of the approach to others in the HCI and CSCW communities for applying the method. | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 05:09, 26 August 2021
| Porcheron2020 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Porcheron2020 |
| Author(s) | Martin Porcheron, Joel E. Fischer, Stuart Reeves |
| Title | Pulling Back the Curtain on the Wizards of Oz |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, woz, natural language interfaces, voice interfaces, vuis, robots, ethnography, ethnomethodology, cscw, AI reference list |
| Publisher | Association for Computing Machinery |
| Year | 2020 |
| Language | |
| City | New York, NY, USA |
| Month | |
| Journal | Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction |
| Volume | 4 |
| Number | CSCW3 |
| Pages | |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1145/3432942 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
The Wizard of Oz method is an increasingly common practice in HCI and CSCW studies as part of iterative design processes for interactive systems. Instead of designing a fully-fledged system, the `technical work' of key system components is completed by human operators yet presented to study participants as if computed by a machine. Yet, little is known about how Wizard of Oz studies are interactionally and collaboratively achieved in situ by researchers and participants. By adopting ethnomethodological perspective, we analyse our use of the method in studies with a voice-controlled vacuum robot \changeand two researchers present. We present data that reveals the work of how such studies are organised and presented to participants and unpack the coordinated orchestration work that unfolds `behind the scenes' to complete the study. We examine how the researchers attend to participant requests and technical breakdowns, and discuss the performative, collaborative, and methodological nature of their work. We conclude by offering insights from our application of the approach to others in the HCI and CSCW communities for applying the method.
Notes
