Difference between revisions of "Ibarra2021"
SaulAlbert (talk | contribs) m (SaulAlbert moved page Ibarra2020 to Ibarra2021 without leaving a redirect) |
SaulAlbert (talk | contribs) |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
|Author(s)=Alexis Ibarra Martínez; | |Author(s)=Alexis Ibarra Martínez; | ||
|Title=Reflexiones en torno a la psicología discursiva: problemas, contradicciones y posibilidades | |Title=Reflexiones en torno a la psicología discursiva: problemas, contradicciones y posibilidades | ||
| − | |Tag(s)=EMCA; DIscursive psychology | + | |
| − | |Key= | + | discourse analysis, social constructionism, qualitative research, interaction, social action discourse analysis, social constructionism, qualitative research, interaction, social action |
| + | |Tag(s)=EMCA; DIscursive psychology; Discourse analysis; Social constructionism; Qualitative research; interaction; Social action discourse analysis | ||
| + | |Key=Ibarra2021 | ||
|Publisher=Revista SOMEPSO | |Publisher=Revista SOMEPSO | ||
|Year=2021 | |Year=2021 | ||
| Line 12: | Line 14: | ||
|Pages=12-40 | |Pages=12-40 | ||
|URL=https://revistasomepso.org/index.php/revistasomepso/article/view/82 | |URL=https://revistasomepso.org/index.php/revistasomepso/article/view/82 | ||
| + | |Abstract=Resumen | ||
| + | |||
| + | La psicología discursiva parte de la noción de discurso, habla y texto como prácticas sociales, estudia cómo se construyen versiones de lo psicológico dentro de la interacción. El objetivo de este artículo es hacer una revisión crítica de esta perspectiva que en la actualidad se enfoca en el crecimiento y la sobrespecialización. Busco examinar las premisas de fondo de las cuales emana el proceso de producción de conocimiento: su definición, objeto de estudio y campo de acción. Marco una distinción entre dos comprensiones que se entremezclan en la literatura, una de carácter abierto interesada en todos los aspectos de la vida social, otra de carácter restringido centrada en construcciones discursivas de la cognición. Busco criticar la idea tácita de que lo psicológico y lo cognitivo son términos equivalentes, esta premisa excluye la posibilidad de estudiar otros vocabularios que las personas emplean en su vida cotidiana. El argumento central es que la práctica de investigación contradice el espíritu original de la perspectiva discursiva y limita su potencial. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Abstract | ||
| + | |||
| + | Discursive psychology starts from the notion of discourse, talk and text as social | ||
| + | practices, to study how versions of the psychological are constructed within | ||
| + | interaction. The goal of this article is to critically review a perspective that currently | ||
| + | focuses on growth and overspecialization. I seek to examine the underlying premises | ||
| + | of discursive psychology and from which the entire process of knowledge production | ||
| + | emanates: its definition, its object of study and its field of action. I make a distinction | ||
| + | between two different understandings that appear intertwined in literature, one of an | ||
| + | open nature interested in all aspects of social life, the other of a restricted nature | ||
| + | focused on discursive constructions of cognition. I seek to criticize the implicit notion | ||
| + | that the psychological and the cognitive are synonymous, this understanding of the | ||
| + | psychological excludes the possibility of studying other vocabularies that people use | ||
| + | in their daily lives. The central argument is that the actual research practice | ||
| + | contradicts the original spirit of the discursive perspective and limits its potential. | ||
| + | Key words: discourse analysis; social constructionism; qualitative research; | ||
| + | interaction; social action. | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 09:23, 12 February 2021
| Ibarra2021 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Ibarra2021 |
| Author(s) | Alexis Ibarra Martínez |
| Title | Reflexiones en torno a la psicología discursiva: problemas, contradicciones y posibilidades
discourse analysis, social constructionism, qualitative research, interaction, social action discourse analysis, social constructionism, qualitative research, interaction, social action |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, DIscursive psychology, Discourse analysis, Social constructionism, Qualitative research, interaction, Social action discourse analysis |
| Publisher | Revista SOMEPSO |
| Year | 2021 |
| Language | Spanish |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | |
| Volume | 5 |
| Number | 2 |
| Pages | 12-40 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
Resumen
La psicología discursiva parte de la noción de discurso, habla y texto como prácticas sociales, estudia cómo se construyen versiones de lo psicológico dentro de la interacción. El objetivo de este artículo es hacer una revisión crítica de esta perspectiva que en la actualidad se enfoca en el crecimiento y la sobrespecialización. Busco examinar las premisas de fondo de las cuales emana el proceso de producción de conocimiento: su definición, objeto de estudio y campo de acción. Marco una distinción entre dos comprensiones que se entremezclan en la literatura, una de carácter abierto interesada en todos los aspectos de la vida social, otra de carácter restringido centrada en construcciones discursivas de la cognición. Busco criticar la idea tácita de que lo psicológico y lo cognitivo son términos equivalentes, esta premisa excluye la posibilidad de estudiar otros vocabularios que las personas emplean en su vida cotidiana. El argumento central es que la práctica de investigación contradice el espíritu original de la perspectiva discursiva y limita su potencial.
Abstract
Discursive psychology starts from the notion of discourse, talk and text as social practices, to study how versions of the psychological are constructed within interaction. The goal of this article is to critically review a perspective that currently focuses on growth and overspecialization. I seek to examine the underlying premises of discursive psychology and from which the entire process of knowledge production emanates: its definition, its object of study and its field of action. I make a distinction between two different understandings that appear intertwined in literature, one of an open nature interested in all aspects of social life, the other of a restricted nature focused on discursive constructions of cognition. I seek to criticize the implicit notion that the psychological and the cognitive are synonymous, this understanding of the psychological excludes the possibility of studying other vocabularies that people use in their daily lives. The central argument is that the actual research practice contradicts the original spirit of the discursive perspective and limits its potential. Key words: discourse analysis; social constructionism; qualitative research; interaction; social action.
Notes
