Difference between revisions of "Kendrick2020"
SaulAlbert (talk | contribs) (BibTeX auto import 2021-01-28 12:45:53) |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{BibEntry | {{BibEntry | ||
| − | | | + | |BibType=ARTICLE |
| − | | | + | |Author(s)=Kobin H. Kendrick; Penelope Brown; Mark Dingemanse; Simeon Floyd; Sonja Gipper; Kaoru Hayano; Elliott Hoey; Gertie Hoymann; Elizabeth Manrique; Giovanni Rossi; Stephen C. Levinson; |
|Title=Sequence Organization: A Universal Infrastructure for Social Action | |Title=Sequence Organization: A Universal Infrastructure for Social Action | ||
| − | |||
|Tag(s)=EMCA; Conversation analysis; Cross-cultural; Sequence organization; Universals | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Conversation analysis; Cross-cultural; Sequence organization; Universals | ||
| − | | | + | |Key=Kendrick2020 |
|Year=2020 | |Year=2020 | ||
| − | | | + | |Language=English |
|Journal=Journal of Pragmatics | |Journal=Journal of Pragmatics | ||
|Volume=168 | |Volume=168 | ||
|Pages=119–138 | |Pages=119–138 | ||
| + | |URL=https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0378216620301454 | ||
|DOI=10.1016/j.pragma.2020.06.009 | |DOI=10.1016/j.pragma.2020.06.009 | ||
|Abstract=This article makes the case for the universality of the sequence organization observable in informal human conversational interaction. Using the descriptive schema developed by Schegloff (2007), we examine the major patterns of action-sequencing in a dozen nearly all unrelated languages. What we find is that these patterns are instantiated in very similar ways for the most part right down to the types of different action sequences. There are also some notably different cultural exploitations of the patterns, but the patterns themselves look strongly universal. Recent work in gestural communication in the great apes suggests that sequence organization may have been a crucial route into the development of language. Taken together with the fundamental role of this organization in language acquisition, sequential behavior of this kind seems to have both phylogenetic and ontogenetic priority, which probably puts substantial functional pressure on language form. | |Abstract=This article makes the case for the universality of the sequence organization observable in informal human conversational interaction. Using the descriptive schema developed by Schegloff (2007), we examine the major patterns of action-sequencing in a dozen nearly all unrelated languages. What we find is that these patterns are instantiated in very similar ways for the most part right down to the types of different action sequences. There are also some notably different cultural exploitations of the patterns, but the patterns themselves look strongly universal. Recent work in gestural communication in the great apes suggests that sequence organization may have been a crucial route into the development of language. Taken together with the fundamental role of this organization in language acquisition, sequential behavior of this kind seems to have both phylogenetic and ontogenetic priority, which probably puts substantial functional pressure on language form. | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 05:10, 26 August 2021
| Kendrick2020 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Kendrick2020 |
| Author(s) | Kobin H. Kendrick, Penelope Brown, Mark Dingemanse, Simeon Floyd, Sonja Gipper, Kaoru Hayano, Elliott Hoey, Gertie Hoymann, Elizabeth Manrique, Giovanni Rossi, Stephen C. Levinson |
| Title | Sequence Organization: A Universal Infrastructure for Social Action |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, Conversation analysis, Cross-cultural, Sequence organization, Universals |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2020 |
| Language | English |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Journal of Pragmatics |
| Volume | 168 |
| Number | |
| Pages | 119–138 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.pragma.2020.06.009 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
This article makes the case for the universality of the sequence organization observable in informal human conversational interaction. Using the descriptive schema developed by Schegloff (2007), we examine the major patterns of action-sequencing in a dozen nearly all unrelated languages. What we find is that these patterns are instantiated in very similar ways for the most part right down to the types of different action sequences. There are also some notably different cultural exploitations of the patterns, but the patterns themselves look strongly universal. Recent work in gestural communication in the great apes suggests that sequence organization may have been a crucial route into the development of language. Taken together with the fundamental role of this organization in language acquisition, sequential behavior of this kind seems to have both phylogenetic and ontogenetic priority, which probably puts substantial functional pressure on language form.
Notes
