Difference between revisions of "Gibson2021"
ElliottHoey (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=David R. Gibson |Title=Repetition Acknowledgment Prefaces |Tag(s)=EMCA; Goffman; Repetition; Prefaces; In press |Key=Gibson2021 |Year=20...") |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
|Author(s)=David R. Gibson | |Author(s)=David R. Gibson | ||
|Title=Repetition Acknowledgment Prefaces | |Title=Repetition Acknowledgment Prefaces | ||
| − | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Goffman; Repetition; Prefaces | + | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Goffman; Repetition; Prefaces |
|Key=Gibson2021 | |Key=Gibson2021 | ||
|Year=2021 | |Year=2021 | ||
|Language=English | |Language=English | ||
|Journal=Symbolic Interaction | |Journal=Symbolic Interaction | ||
| + | |Volume=44 | ||
| + | |Number=4 | ||
| + | |Pages=819–842 | ||
|URL=https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/symb.531 | |URL=https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/symb.531 | ||
| − | |DOI= | + | |DOI=10.1002/symb.531 |
|Abstract=I consider a particularly puzzling conversational phenomenon: the repetition acknowledgment preface, or RAP, which consists of a brief reference to an earlier telling of a story, or topic of conversation, prior to its repetition (e.g., I was just telling John…). Drawing on the work of Erving Goffman, in particular, and a collection of carefully documented empirical episodes, I identify eleven functions RAPs may serve (intentionally or unintentionally), the circumstantial preconditions for each, and the extent to which RAPs are well‐suited for it, conjecturing that well‐suitedness is a clue to RAPs' original purpose. | |Abstract=I consider a particularly puzzling conversational phenomenon: the repetition acknowledgment preface, or RAP, which consists of a brief reference to an earlier telling of a story, or topic of conversation, prior to its repetition (e.g., I was just telling John…). Drawing on the work of Erving Goffman, in particular, and a collection of carefully documented empirical episodes, I identify eleven functions RAPs may serve (intentionally or unintentionally), the circumstantial preconditions for each, and the extent to which RAPs are well‐suited for it, conjecturing that well‐suitedness is a clue to RAPs' original purpose. | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 00:48, 5 November 2021
| Gibson2021 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Gibson2021 |
| Author(s) | David R. Gibson |
| Title | Repetition Acknowledgment Prefaces |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, Goffman, Repetition, Prefaces |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2021 |
| Language | English |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Symbolic Interaction |
| Volume | 44 |
| Number | 4 |
| Pages | 819–842 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1002/symb.531 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
I consider a particularly puzzling conversational phenomenon: the repetition acknowledgment preface, or RAP, which consists of a brief reference to an earlier telling of a story, or topic of conversation, prior to its repetition (e.g., I was just telling John…). Drawing on the work of Erving Goffman, in particular, and a collection of carefully documented empirical episodes, I identify eleven functions RAPs may serve (intentionally or unintentionally), the circumstantial preconditions for each, and the extent to which RAPs are well‐suited for it, conjecturing that well‐suitedness is a clue to RAPs' original purpose.
Notes
