Difference between revisions of "Wilton2021"
ElliottHoey (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Antje Wilton |Title=Epistemics in post-match interviews: A focus on questioning turn design |Tag(s)=EMCA; Epistemics; Interviews; Media...") |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
|BibType=ARTICLE | |BibType=ARTICLE | ||
|Author(s)=Antje Wilton | |Author(s)=Antje Wilton | ||
| − | |Title=Epistemics in post-match interviews: A focus on | + | |Title=Epistemics in post-match interviews: A focus on questioning turn design |
| − | questioning turn design | + | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Epistemics; Interviews; Media; Questions; Question design |
| − | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Epistemics; Interviews; Media; Questions; Question design | ||
|Key=Wilton2021 | |Key=Wilton2021 | ||
|Year=2021 | |Year=2021 | ||
|Language=English | |Language=English | ||
|Journal=International Journal of Applied Linguistics | |Journal=International Journal of Applied Linguistics | ||
| + | |Volume=31 | ||
| + | |Number=1 | ||
| + | |Pages=132–150 | ||
|URL=https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/ijal.12326 | |URL=https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/ijal.12326 | ||
|DOI=10.1111/ijal.12326 | |DOI=10.1111/ijal.12326 | ||
| − | |Abstract=This contribution reports on a study of questioning turns in | + | |Abstract=This contribution reports on a study of questioning turns in German and English football post-match interviews (PMIs). Previous research on PMIs suggests that their main aim is to provide room for a delivery of the player's perspective of the match, thereby foregrounding his expertise and experience. The study uses a conversation analytic approach to focus on how interviewers design their turns in order to achieve this foregrounding. It is shown that participants employ means to systematically maintain an epistemic balance that reflects the player's epistemic access to the match as more authoritative. Furthermore, while both German and English interviewers perform similar actions in their turns, there are significant differences in the use of overtly marked questions, revealing different overall strategies of foregrounding. |
| − | German and English football post-match interviews (PMIs). | ||
| − | Previous research on PMIs suggests that their main aim is to | ||
| − | provide room for a delivery of the | ||
| − | match, thereby foregrounding his expertise and experience. | ||
| − | The study uses a conversation analytic approach to focus on | ||
| − | how interviewers design their turns in order to achieve this | ||
| − | foregrounding. It is shown that participants employ means | ||
| − | to systematically maintain an epistemic balance that reflects | ||
| − | the | ||
| − | revealing different overall strategies of foregrounding. | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 11:15, 16 June 2021
| Wilton2021 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Wilton2021 |
| Author(s) | Antje Wilton |
| Title | Epistemics in post-match interviews: A focus on questioning turn design |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, Epistemics, Interviews, Media, Questions, Question design |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2021 |
| Language | English |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | International Journal of Applied Linguistics |
| Volume | 31 |
| Number | 1 |
| Pages | 132–150 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1111/ijal.12326 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
This contribution reports on a study of questioning turns in German and English football post-match interviews (PMIs). Previous research on PMIs suggests that their main aim is to provide room for a delivery of the player's perspective of the match, thereby foregrounding his expertise and experience. The study uses a conversation analytic approach to focus on how interviewers design their turns in order to achieve this foregrounding. It is shown that participants employ means to systematically maintain an epistemic balance that reflects the player's epistemic access to the match as more authoritative. Furthermore, while both German and English interviewers perform similar actions in their turns, there are significant differences in the use of overtly marked questions, revealing different overall strategies of foregrounding.
Notes
