Difference between revisions of "Rawls2021a"
JakubMlynar (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Anne Warfield Rawls; Jason Turowetz; |Title=“Discovering culture” in interaction: solving problems in cultural sociology by recoveri...") |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) m (AndreiKorbut moved page Rawls2019c to Rawls2021a without leaving a redirect) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
|Author(s)=Anne Warfield Rawls; Jason Turowetz; | |Author(s)=Anne Warfield Rawls; Jason Turowetz; | ||
|Title=“Discovering culture” in interaction: solving problems in cultural sociology by recovering the interactional side of Parsons’ conception of culture | |Title=“Discovering culture” in interaction: solving problems in cultural sociology by recovering the interactional side of Parsons’ conception of culture | ||
| − | |Tag(s)=EMCA | + | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Cutural theory; Social interaction; Durkheim; Parsons; Garfinkel |
| − | |Key= | + | |Key=Rawls2021a |
| − | |Year= | + | |Year=2021 |
|Language=English | |Language=English | ||
|Journal=American Journal of Cultural Sociology | |Journal=American Journal of Cultural Sociology | ||
| + | |Volume=9 | ||
| + | |Number=3 | ||
| + | |Pages=293–320 | ||
|URL=https://link.springer.com/article/10.1057%2Fs41290-019-00079-6 | |URL=https://link.springer.com/article/10.1057%2Fs41290-019-00079-6 | ||
|DOI=10.1057/s41290-019-00079-6 | |DOI=10.1057/s41290-019-00079-6 | ||
|Abstract=According to Lizardo (2016), the concept of culture, as it originated with Parsons, is one of the “foundational notions” of modern sociology, such that “the most basic theoretical debates in the discipline…now take place largely under the auspices of ‘cultural theory.’” Unfortunately, to the extent that contemporary conceptions of culture are traced to Parsons, contradictions in cultural theory are also blamed on his legacy: with cultural theorists turning to anthropology, semiotics, and philosophy for solutions. We argue instead that problems in cultural theory are not a consequence of Parsons’ legacy per se, but of a one-sided focus on his early work that ignores the interactionism of Parsons’ later position. The resulting emphasis on the symbolic side of Parsons’ legacy, as developed in anthropology by Geertz (Parsons’ PhD student, 1950–1956), to the exclusion of the social practice-oriented side developed in sociology by the later Parsons and Garfinkel (Parsons’ PhD student, 1946–1952), has left cultural theory in a state of incompleteness. We propose a rapprochement between Garfinkel’s interactionism, which treats the order properties of practices as interactional media of cooperation in the making of culture, and the prevailing symbolic approach, to reintegrate the two sides of Parsons’ conception of culture. | |Abstract=According to Lizardo (2016), the concept of culture, as it originated with Parsons, is one of the “foundational notions” of modern sociology, such that “the most basic theoretical debates in the discipline…now take place largely under the auspices of ‘cultural theory.’” Unfortunately, to the extent that contemporary conceptions of culture are traced to Parsons, contradictions in cultural theory are also blamed on his legacy: with cultural theorists turning to anthropology, semiotics, and philosophy for solutions. We argue instead that problems in cultural theory are not a consequence of Parsons’ legacy per se, but of a one-sided focus on his early work that ignores the interactionism of Parsons’ later position. The resulting emphasis on the symbolic side of Parsons’ legacy, as developed in anthropology by Geertz (Parsons’ PhD student, 1950–1956), to the exclusion of the social practice-oriented side developed in sociology by the later Parsons and Garfinkel (Parsons’ PhD student, 1946–1952), has left cultural theory in a state of incompleteness. We propose a rapprochement between Garfinkel’s interactionism, which treats the order properties of practices as interactional media of cooperation in the making of culture, and the prevailing symbolic approach, to reintegrate the two sides of Parsons’ conception of culture. | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 05:40, 2 September 2021
| Rawls2021a | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Rawls2021a |
| Author(s) | Anne Warfield Rawls, Jason Turowetz |
| Title | “Discovering culture” in interaction: solving problems in cultural sociology by recovering the interactional side of Parsons’ conception of culture |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, Cutural theory, Social interaction, Durkheim, Parsons, Garfinkel |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2021 |
| Language | English |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | American Journal of Cultural Sociology |
| Volume | 9 |
| Number | 3 |
| Pages | 293–320 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1057/s41290-019-00079-6 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
According to Lizardo (2016), the concept of culture, as it originated with Parsons, is one of the “foundational notions” of modern sociology, such that “the most basic theoretical debates in the discipline…now take place largely under the auspices of ‘cultural theory.’” Unfortunately, to the extent that contemporary conceptions of culture are traced to Parsons, contradictions in cultural theory are also blamed on his legacy: with cultural theorists turning to anthropology, semiotics, and philosophy for solutions. We argue instead that problems in cultural theory are not a consequence of Parsons’ legacy per se, but of a one-sided focus on his early work that ignores the interactionism of Parsons’ later position. The resulting emphasis on the symbolic side of Parsons’ legacy, as developed in anthropology by Geertz (Parsons’ PhD student, 1950–1956), to the exclusion of the social practice-oriented side developed in sociology by the later Parsons and Garfinkel (Parsons’ PhD student, 1946–1952), has left cultural theory in a state of incompleteness. We propose a rapprochement between Garfinkel’s interactionism, which treats the order properties of practices as interactional media of cooperation in the making of culture, and the prevailing symbolic approach, to reintegrate the two sides of Parsons’ conception of culture.
Notes
