Difference between revisions of "Laury-Helasvuo2020"
ElliottHoey (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=INCOLLECTION |Author(s)=Ritva Laury; Marja-Liisa Helasvuo |Title=The emergence and routinization of complex syntactic patterns formed with ajatella ‘thin...") |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
|Author(s)=Ritva Laury; Marja-Liisa Helasvuo | |Author(s)=Ritva Laury; Marja-Liisa Helasvuo | ||
|Title=The emergence and routinization of complex syntactic patterns formed with ajatella ‘think’ and tietää ‘know’ in Finnish talk-in-interaction | |Title=The emergence and routinization of complex syntactic patterns formed with ajatella ‘think’ and tietää ‘know’ in Finnish talk-in-interaction | ||
− | |Editor(s)=Yael Maschler | + | |Editor(s)=Yael Maschler; Simona Pekarek Doehler; Jan Lindström; Leelo Keevallik |
|Tag(s)=EMCA; Finnish; Cognitive verb; Grammar; Interactional linguistics; Complementation; Fixedness | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Finnish; Cognitive verb; Grammar; Interactional linguistics; Complementation; Fixedness | ||
|Key=Laury-Helasvuo2020 | |Key=Laury-Helasvuo2020 | ||
+ | |Publisher=John Benjamins | ||
|Year=2020 | |Year=2020 | ||
|Language=English | |Language=English | ||
− | |Booktitle=Emergent Syntax for Conversation: Clausal | + | |Address=Amsterdam |
− | |Pages= | + | |Booktitle=Emergent Syntax for Conversation: Clausal Patterns and the Organization of Action |
+ | |Pages=55–86 | ||
|URL=https://benjamins.com/catalog/slsi.32.03lau | |URL=https://benjamins.com/catalog/slsi.32.03lau | ||
− | |DOI= | + | |DOI=10.1075/slsi.32.03lau |
|Abstract=Our paper concerns two Finnish cognitive verbs, ajatella ‘think’, and tietää ‘know’. We show that both verbs are most likely to occur in the first person singular form but behave differently with respect to polarity: tietää occurs most commonly in the negated form (56%), while ajatella is only rarely negated (less than 4%). The verbs also differ with respect to their sequential emergence and complementation, with tietää ‘to know’ occurring nearly half of the time in responsive position and without complements. Each of the most common formats of the verbs builds or projects a specific social action. The patterns of clause combining, in this case, complementation or lack of it, are closely connected to the locally contingent employment of action. | |Abstract=Our paper concerns two Finnish cognitive verbs, ajatella ‘think’, and tietää ‘know’. We show that both verbs are most likely to occur in the first person singular form but behave differently with respect to polarity: tietää occurs most commonly in the negated form (56%), while ajatella is only rarely negated (less than 4%). The verbs also differ with respect to their sequential emergence and complementation, with tietää ‘to know’ occurring nearly half of the time in responsive position and without complements. Each of the most common formats of the verbs builds or projects a specific social action. The patterns of clause combining, in this case, complementation or lack of it, are closely connected to the locally contingent employment of action. | ||
}} | }} |
Latest revision as of 23:07, 24 February 2020
Laury-Helasvuo2020 | |
---|---|
BibType | INCOLLECTION |
Key | Laury-Helasvuo2020 |
Author(s) | Ritva Laury, Marja-Liisa Helasvuo |
Title | The emergence and routinization of complex syntactic patterns formed with ajatella ‘think’ and tietää ‘know’ in Finnish talk-in-interaction |
Editor(s) | Yael Maschler, Simona Pekarek Doehler, Jan Lindström, Leelo Keevallik |
Tag(s) | EMCA, Finnish, Cognitive verb, Grammar, Interactional linguistics, Complementation, Fixedness |
Publisher | John Benjamins |
Year | 2020 |
Language | English |
City | Amsterdam |
Month | |
Journal | |
Volume | |
Number | |
Pages | 55–86 |
URL | Link |
DOI | 10.1075/slsi.32.03lau |
ISBN | |
Organization | |
Institution | |
School | |
Type | |
Edition | |
Series | |
Howpublished | |
Book title | Emergent Syntax for Conversation: Clausal Patterns and the Organization of Action |
Chapter |
Abstract
Our paper concerns two Finnish cognitive verbs, ajatella ‘think’, and tietää ‘know’. We show that both verbs are most likely to occur in the first person singular form but behave differently with respect to polarity: tietää occurs most commonly in the negated form (56%), while ajatella is only rarely negated (less than 4%). The verbs also differ with respect to their sequential emergence and complementation, with tietää ‘to know’ occurring nearly half of the time in responsive position and without complements. Each of the most common formats of the verbs builds or projects a specific social action. The patterns of clause combining, in this case, complementation or lack of it, are closely connected to the locally contingent employment of action.
Notes