Difference between revisions of "Edwards2006"

From emcawiki
Jump to: navigation, search
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
 
|BibType=ARTICLE
 
|BibType=ARTICLE
 
|Author(s)=Derek Edwards;
 
|Author(s)=Derek Edwards;
|Title=Discourse, cognition and social practices: the rich surface of language
+
|Title=Discourse, cognition and social practices: the rich surface of language and social interaction
and social interaction
+
|Tag(s)=Discursive Psychology; cognition; conversation analysis; discourse; intentionality;
|Tag(s)=Discursive Psychology;
 
 
|Key=Edwards2006
 
|Key=Edwards2006
 
|Year=2006
 
|Year=2006
 +
|Language=English
 
|Journal=Discourse Studies
 
|Journal=Discourse Studies
 
|Volume=8
 
|Volume=8
 
|Number=1
 
|Number=1
 
|Pages=41–49
 
|Pages=41–49
|URL=http://dis.sagepub.com/content/8/1/41.abstract
+
|URL=https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1461445606059551
 +
|DOI=10.1177/1461445606059551
 +
|Abstract=Discursive psychology (DP) approaches discourse not as the product or expression of thoughts or mental states lying behind or beneath it, but as a domain of public accountability in which psychological states are made relevant. DP draws heavily on conversation analysis in examining in close empirical detail how ostensibly psychological themes are handled and managed as part of talk’s everyday interactional business. A brief worked example is offered, in which the intentionality of a person’s actions is handled in the course of police interrogation, in ways that perform police work. Degrees of intentionality are partialled out with regard to specific actions or components of actions, and with regard to how actions are described in ways that map onto how crime categories are defined in law. Cognitive states are generally relevant in discourse in the same manner, as participants’ concerns with regard to action categories and accountability on and for the occasions they are invoked.
 
}}
 
}}

Latest revision as of 09:58, 13 November 2019

Edwards2006
BibType ARTICLE
Key Edwards2006
Author(s) Derek Edwards
Title Discourse, cognition and social practices: the rich surface of language and social interaction
Editor(s)
Tag(s) Discursive Psychology, cognition, conversation analysis, discourse, intentionality
Publisher
Year 2006
Language English
City
Month
Journal Discourse Studies
Volume 8
Number 1
Pages 41–49
URL Link
DOI 10.1177/1461445606059551
ISBN
Organization
Institution
School
Type
Edition
Series
Howpublished
Book title
Chapter

Download BibTex

Abstract

Discursive psychology (DP) approaches discourse not as the product or expression of thoughts or mental states lying behind or beneath it, but as a domain of public accountability in which psychological states are made relevant. DP draws heavily on conversation analysis in examining in close empirical detail how ostensibly psychological themes are handled and managed as part of talk’s everyday interactional business. A brief worked example is offered, in which the intentionality of a person’s actions is handled in the course of police interrogation, in ways that perform police work. Degrees of intentionality are partialled out with regard to specific actions or components of actions, and with regard to how actions are described in ways that map onto how crime categories are defined in law. Cognitive states are generally relevant in discourse in the same manner, as participants’ concerns with regard to action categories and accountability on and for the occasions they are invoked.

Notes