Difference between revisions of "Mundwiler-Kreuz2018"
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) m (AndreiKorbut moved page Mundwiler2018 to Mundwiler-Kreuz2018 without leaving a redirect) |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
|BibType=INCOLLECTION | |BibType=INCOLLECTION | ||
|Author(s)=Vera Mundwiler; Judith Kreuz | |Author(s)=Vera Mundwiler; Judith Kreuz | ||
− | |Title=Collaborative | + | |Title=Collaborative decision-making in argumentative group discussions among primary school children |
− | |Editor(s)= | + | |Editor(s)=Steve Oswald; Thierry Herman; Jérôme Jacquin |
|Tag(s)=EMCA; Persuasion; Argumentation; Primary school; Group discussion | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Persuasion; Argumentation; Primary school; Group discussion | ||
|Key=Mundwiler-Kreuz2018 | |Key=Mundwiler-Kreuz2018 | ||
+ | |Publisher=Springer | ||
|Year=2018 | |Year=2018 | ||
|Language=English | |Language=English | ||
− | |Booktitle=Argumentation and Language | + | |Address=Cham |
+ | |Booktitle=Argumentation and Language: Linguistic, Cognitive and Discursive Explorations | ||
|URL=https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-73972-4_12 | |URL=https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-73972-4_12 | ||
− | |DOI= | + | |DOI=10.1007/978-3-319-73972-4_12 |
|Abstract=When people have to reach agreement on a given problem, they can rely on various practices and resources. The present study focuses on collaborative processes of group decision-making and investigates the use of argumentative and alternative strategies. This allows to reconstruct the development across different age groups. The analyses are based on video-recorded group discussions among primary school children (grade 2, 4, 6). The results show how the pupils increasingly manage to combine various strategies and cooperatively elaborate the breadth and depth of their argumentation. We also find that younger pupils mainly use argumentation to handle disagreement, while older pupils also start engaging in argumentative elaborations in contexts in which everyone agrees. | |Abstract=When people have to reach agreement on a given problem, they can rely on various practices and resources. The present study focuses on collaborative processes of group decision-making and investigates the use of argumentative and alternative strategies. This allows to reconstruct the development across different age groups. The analyses are based on video-recorded group discussions among primary school children (grade 2, 4, 6). The results show how the pupils increasingly manage to combine various strategies and cooperatively elaborate the breadth and depth of their argumentation. We also find that younger pupils mainly use argumentation to handle disagreement, while older pupils also start engaging in argumentative elaborations in contexts in which everyone agrees. | ||
}} | }} |
Latest revision as of 11:34, 12 January 2020
Mundwiler-Kreuz2018 | |
---|---|
BibType | INCOLLECTION |
Key | Mundwiler-Kreuz2018 |
Author(s) | Vera Mundwiler, Judith Kreuz |
Title | Collaborative decision-making in argumentative group discussions among primary school children |
Editor(s) | Steve Oswald, Thierry Herman, Jérôme Jacquin |
Tag(s) | EMCA, Persuasion, Argumentation, Primary school, Group discussion |
Publisher | Springer |
Year | 2018 |
Language | English |
City | Cham |
Month | |
Journal | |
Volume | |
Number | |
Pages | |
URL | Link |
DOI | 10.1007/978-3-319-73972-4_12 |
ISBN | |
Organization | |
Institution | |
School | |
Type | |
Edition | |
Series | |
Howpublished | |
Book title | Argumentation and Language: Linguistic, Cognitive and Discursive Explorations |
Chapter |
Abstract
When people have to reach agreement on a given problem, they can rely on various practices and resources. The present study focuses on collaborative processes of group decision-making and investigates the use of argumentative and alternative strategies. This allows to reconstruct the development across different age groups. The analyses are based on video-recorded group discussions among primary school children (grade 2, 4, 6). The results show how the pupils increasingly manage to combine various strategies and cooperatively elaborate the breadth and depth of their argumentation. We also find that younger pupils mainly use argumentation to handle disagreement, while older pupils also start engaging in argumentative elaborations in contexts in which everyone agrees.
Notes