Difference between revisions of "Stokoe2012"
SaulAlbert (talk | contribs) m (SaulAlbert moved page Stokoe beware 2012 to Stokoe2012: Because of limitations of the emcawiki software, and its compatibility with the BibteX format, we can't have spaces or special characters in page names and BibTeX keys... so we go for Aut...) |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) m |
||
| (4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{BibEntry | {{BibEntry | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
|BibType=ARTICLE | |BibType=ARTICLE | ||
| + | |Author(s)=Elizabeth Stokoe; Alexa Hepburn; Charles Antaki; | ||
| + | |Title=Beware the “Loughborough School” of Social Psychology? Interaction and the politics of intervention | ||
| + | |Tag(s)=complaints; Conversation Analysis; disabilities; discourse; neighbor disputes; people | ||
| + | |Key=Stokoe2012 | ||
|Year=2012 | |Year=2012 | ||
| − | |||
|Journal=British Journal of Social Psychology | |Journal=British Journal of Social Psychology | ||
|Volume=51 | |Volume=51 | ||
|Number=3 | |Number=3 | ||
|Pages=486–496 | |Pages=486–496 | ||
| + | |URL=http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.2044-8309.2011.02088.x/abstract | ||
|DOI=10.1111/j.2044-8309.2011.02088.x | |DOI=10.1111/j.2044-8309.2011.02088.x | ||
|Note=WOS:000308480200009 | |Note=WOS:000308480200009 | ||
| − | |Abstract=The authors explain the attractions of applying discursive psychology (DP) and | + | |Abstract=The authors explain the attractions of applying discursive psychology (DP) and Conversation Analysis (CA) by reporting three different examples of their engagement with practitioners and clients. Along the way, a case is made for separating DP/CA from other kinds of qualitative analysis in social psychology, and for deconstructing some commonly held misunderstandings and caricatures of DP/CA. |
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 07:44, 29 November 2019
| Stokoe2012 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Stokoe2012 |
| Author(s) | Elizabeth Stokoe, Alexa Hepburn, Charles Antaki |
| Title | Beware the “Loughborough School” of Social Psychology? Interaction and the politics of intervention |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | complaints, Conversation Analysis, disabilities, discourse, neighbor disputes, people |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2012 |
| Language | |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | British Journal of Social Psychology |
| Volume | 51 |
| Number | 3 |
| Pages | 486–496 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1111/j.2044-8309.2011.02088.x |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
The authors explain the attractions of applying discursive psychology (DP) and Conversation Analysis (CA) by reporting three different examples of their engagement with practitioners and clients. Along the way, a case is made for separating DP/CA from other kinds of qualitative analysis in social psychology, and for deconstructing some commonly held misunderstandings and caricatures of DP/CA.
Notes
WOS:000308480200009
