Difference between revisions of "Finlay2012"
SaulAlbert (talk | contribs) m (SaulAlbert moved page Finlay how 2012 to Finlay2012: Because of limitations of the emcawiki software, and its compatibility with the BibteX format, we can't have spaces or special characters in page names and BibTeX keys... so we go for Author...) |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) m |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{BibEntry | {{BibEntry | ||
| − | | | + | |BibType=ARTICLE |
| − | | | + | |Author(s)=W. M. L. Finlay; Charles Antaki; |
|Title=How staff pursue questions to adults with intellectual disabilities | |Title=How staff pursue questions to adults with intellectual disabilities | ||
| − | + | |Tag(s)=communication; Conversation Analysis; intellectual disabilities; interaction; mental-retardation; mild; people; questions; staff | |
| − | |Tag(s)=communication; | + | |Key=Finlay2012 |
| − | | | ||
|Year=2012 | |Year=2012 | ||
| − | |||
|Journal=Journal of Intellectual Disability Research | |Journal=Journal of Intellectual Disability Research | ||
|Volume=56 | |Volume=56 | ||
|Number=4 | |Number=4 | ||
|Pages=361–370 | |Pages=361–370 | ||
| + | |URL=http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1365-2788.2011.01478.x/abstract | ||
|DOI=10.1111/j.1365-2788.2011.01478.x | |DOI=10.1111/j.1365-2788.2011.01478.x | ||
|Note=WOS:000301528900004 | |Note=WOS:000301528900004 | ||
|Abstract=Background When support staff use questions to instruct, advise or guide adults with intellectual disabilities (ID), or to solicit information from them, the interaction does not always proceed smoothly, particularly when replies are ambiguous, absent or not obviously relevant. That can lead to interactional trouble and dissatisfaction, or worse. Methods We report on the ways in which staff members transform their questions over a series of conversational turns in order to solicit an adequate reply, and thereby to fulfil the interactional goal of the question. Our data come from approximately 30 h of recordings of natural conversation between staff members and adults with ID in two residential and one outdoor activities settings. Results We identify seven practices by which staff attempt to resolve the dilemma between undue direction and premature closure. These include: expansion of the original question, simplifying its format, changing its content in various ways and realising its alternatives in physical form. Conclusions We highlight strategies which produce answers satisfactory to both parties, and improve the quality of interaction between staff and people with ID. | |Abstract=Background When support staff use questions to instruct, advise or guide adults with intellectual disabilities (ID), or to solicit information from them, the interaction does not always proceed smoothly, particularly when replies are ambiguous, absent or not obviously relevant. That can lead to interactional trouble and dissatisfaction, or worse. Methods We report on the ways in which staff members transform their questions over a series of conversational turns in order to solicit an adequate reply, and thereby to fulfil the interactional goal of the question. Our data come from approximately 30 h of recordings of natural conversation between staff members and adults with ID in two residential and one outdoor activities settings. Results We identify seven practices by which staff attempt to resolve the dilemma between undue direction and premature closure. These include: expansion of the original question, simplifying its format, changing its content in various ways and realising its alternatives in physical form. Conclusions We highlight strategies which produce answers satisfactory to both parties, and improve the quality of interaction between staff and people with ID. | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 07:42, 29 November 2019
| Finlay2012 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Finlay2012 |
| Author(s) | W. M. L. Finlay, Charles Antaki |
| Title | How staff pursue questions to adults with intellectual disabilities |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | communication, Conversation Analysis, intellectual disabilities, interaction, mental-retardation, mild, people, questions, staff |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2012 |
| Language | |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Journal of Intellectual Disability Research |
| Volume | 56 |
| Number | 4 |
| Pages | 361–370 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1111/j.1365-2788.2011.01478.x |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
Background When support staff use questions to instruct, advise or guide adults with intellectual disabilities (ID), or to solicit information from them, the interaction does not always proceed smoothly, particularly when replies are ambiguous, absent or not obviously relevant. That can lead to interactional trouble and dissatisfaction, or worse. Methods We report on the ways in which staff members transform their questions over a series of conversational turns in order to solicit an adequate reply, and thereby to fulfil the interactional goal of the question. Our data come from approximately 30 h of recordings of natural conversation between staff members and adults with ID in two residential and one outdoor activities settings. Results We identify seven practices by which staff attempt to resolve the dilemma between undue direction and premature closure. These include: expansion of the original question, simplifying its format, changing its content in various ways and realising its alternatives in physical form. Conclusions We highlight strategies which produce answers satisfactory to both parties, and improve the quality of interaction between staff and people with ID.
Notes
WOS:000301528900004
