Difference between revisions of "Antaki2013a"

From emcawiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(BibTeX auto import 2014-10-23 11:14:41)
 
 
(4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{BibEntry
 
{{BibEntry
|Key=antaki_recipient-side_2013
+
|BibType=ARTICLE
|Key=antaki_recipient-side_2013
+
|Author(s)=Charles Antaki;
 
|Title=Recipient-side test questions
 
|Title=Recipient-side test questions
|Author(s)=Charles Antaki;
+
|Tag(s)=classroom;  Conversation Analysis;  designedly incomplete utterances;  epistemic stance;  epistemic status;  intellectual  impairment;  knowledge;  organization;  repair;  sequences;  support staff;  talk;  teachers;  test questions
|Tag(s)=classroom;  conversation analysis;  designedly incomplete utterances;  epistemic stance;  epistemic status;  intellectual  impairment;  knowledge;  organization;  repair;  sequences;  support staff;  talk;  teachers;  test questions
+
|Key=Antaki2013a
|BibType=ARTICLE
 
 
|Year=2013
 
|Year=2013
|Month=feb
 
 
|Journal=Discourse Studies
 
|Journal=Discourse Studies
 
|Volume=15
 
|Volume=15
 
|Number=1
 
|Number=1
 
|Pages=3–18
 
|Pages=3–18
 +
|URL=https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1461445612466450
 
|DOI=10.1177/1461445612466450
 
|DOI=10.1177/1461445612466450
 
|Note=WOS:000329070300001
 
|Note=WOS:000329070300001
 
|Abstract=Standard test questions allow the questioner to confirm an answer as correct, displaying their greater epistemic authority over the answerer (as in the canonical case of the classroom, where the teacher knows more than the pupil). But the instructional power of test questions may prompt their use even when that asymmetry is neutralized or reversed, and the recipient ought to know as much as, or indeed more than, the questioner. I describe how (and why) staff who support clients with intellectual impairment use what I call 'recipient-side' test questions, where the questioner claims final authority over matters in the recipient's experience, even though it is the recipient who has prior entitlement and access to it. When recipient-side test questions fail, questioners may revert to the standard test question asymmetry by hinting at, or openly asserting, their own epistemic authority.
 
|Abstract=Standard test questions allow the questioner to confirm an answer as correct, displaying their greater epistemic authority over the answerer (as in the canonical case of the classroom, where the teacher knows more than the pupil). But the instructional power of test questions may prompt their use even when that asymmetry is neutralized or reversed, and the recipient ought to know as much as, or indeed more than, the questioner. I describe how (and why) staff who support clients with intellectual impairment use what I call 'recipient-side' test questions, where the questioner claims final authority over matters in the recipient's experience, even though it is the recipient who has prior entitlement and access to it. When recipient-side test questions fail, questioners may revert to the standard test question asymmetry by hinting at, or openly asserting, their own epistemic authority.
 
}}
 
}}

Latest revision as of 09:44, 1 December 2019

Antaki2013a
BibType ARTICLE
Key Antaki2013a
Author(s) Charles Antaki
Title Recipient-side test questions
Editor(s)
Tag(s) classroom, Conversation Analysis, designedly incomplete utterances, epistemic stance, epistemic status, intellectual impairment, knowledge, organization, repair, sequences, support staff, talk, teachers, test questions
Publisher
Year 2013
Language
City
Month
Journal Discourse Studies
Volume 15
Number 1
Pages 3–18
URL Link
DOI 10.1177/1461445612466450
ISBN
Organization
Institution
School
Type
Edition
Series
Howpublished
Book title
Chapter

Download BibTex

Abstract

Standard test questions allow the questioner to confirm an answer as correct, displaying their greater epistemic authority over the answerer (as in the canonical case of the classroom, where the teacher knows more than the pupil). But the instructional power of test questions may prompt their use even when that asymmetry is neutralized or reversed, and the recipient ought to know as much as, or indeed more than, the questioner. I describe how (and why) staff who support clients with intellectual impairment use what I call 'recipient-side' test questions, where the questioner claims final authority over matters in the recipient's experience, even though it is the recipient who has prior entitlement and access to it. When recipient-side test questions fail, questioners may revert to the standard test question asymmetry by hinting at, or openly asserting, their own epistemic authority.

Notes

WOS:000329070300001