Difference between revisions of "Aarsand2019a"
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) m (AndreiKorbut moved page Aarsand-22019 to Aarsand2019a without leaving a redirect) |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) m |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
|Title=Framing and switches at the outset of qualitative research interviews | |Title=Framing and switches at the outset of qualitative research interviews | ||
|Tag(s)=EMCA; activity type; contextualization cues; framing; interactive work; interviewee; interviewer; opening sequences; qualitative research interview; talk-in-interaction | |Tag(s)=EMCA; activity type; contextualization cues; framing; interactive work; interviewee; interviewer; opening sequences; qualitative research interview; talk-in-interaction | ||
| − | |Key= | + | |Key=Aarsand2019a |
|Year=2019 | |Year=2019 | ||
|Language=English | |Language=English | ||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
|Volume=19 | |Volume=19 | ||
|Number=6 | |Number=6 | ||
| − | |Pages= | + | |Pages=635–652 |
| − | |URL=journals.sagepub.com/ | + | |URL=https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1468794118816623 |
| − | + | |DOI=10.1177/1468794118816623 | |
| − | |Abstract=The article focuses on the opening sequences in qualitative research interviews and in particular | + | |Abstract=The article focuses on the opening sequences in qualitative research interviews and in particular examines the interactive work of achieving ‘topic talk’. Using the concepts of activity types, activity frames and contextualization cues, a close-up analysis of eight focus-group interviews and 12 semi-structured interviews was conducted. The findings show that the interviewees display familiarity with the interview as an activity type and how it is to be socially organized. However, to create a joint focus of attention, thereby getting off to an adequate start, the participants also need to agree upon an activity frame and a distribution of positions to achieve a frame switch, which here emerges through the interactional work of announcing, customizing and approving. Accordingly, by highlighting the communicative and practical circumstances of qualitative research interviewing, the opening sequences are considered to be a delicate interactive affair, however, where the interviewer has to take the main responsibility. |
| − | examines the interactive work of achieving ‘topic talk’. Using the concepts of activity types, activity | ||
| − | frames and contextualization cues, a close-up analysis of eight focus-group interviews and 12 semi- | ||
| − | structured interviews was conducted. The findings show that the interviewees display familiarity | ||
| − | with the interview as an activity type and how it is to be socially organized. However, to create | ||
| − | a joint focus of attention, thereby getting off to an adequate start, the participants also need to | ||
| − | agree upon an activity frame and a distribution of positions to achieve a frame switch, which here | ||
| − | emerges through the interactional work of announcing, customizing and approving. Accordingly, by | ||
| − | highlighting the communicative and practical circumstances of qualitative research interviewing, | ||
| − | the opening sequences are considered to be a delicate interactive affair, however, where the | ||
| − | interviewer has to take the main responsibility. | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 11:45, 27 November 2019
| Aarsand2019a | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Aarsand2019a |
| Author(s) | Liselott Aarsand, Pål Aarsand |
| Title | Framing and switches at the outset of qualitative research interviews |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, activity type, contextualization cues, framing, interactive work, interviewee, interviewer, opening sequences, qualitative research interview, talk-in-interaction |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2019 |
| Language | English |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Qualitative Research |
| Volume | 19 |
| Number | 6 |
| Pages | 635–652 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1177/1468794118816623 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
The article focuses on the opening sequences in qualitative research interviews and in particular examines the interactive work of achieving ‘topic talk’. Using the concepts of activity types, activity frames and contextualization cues, a close-up analysis of eight focus-group interviews and 12 semi-structured interviews was conducted. The findings show that the interviewees display familiarity with the interview as an activity type and how it is to be socially organized. However, to create a joint focus of attention, thereby getting off to an adequate start, the participants also need to agree upon an activity frame and a distribution of positions to achieve a frame switch, which here emerges through the interactional work of announcing, customizing and approving. Accordingly, by highlighting the communicative and practical circumstances of qualitative research interviewing, the opening sequences are considered to be a delicate interactive affair, however, where the interviewer has to take the main responsibility.
Notes
