Difference between revisions of "Ono2012"
SaulAlbert (talk | contribs) |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) m |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{BibEntry | {{BibEntry | ||
|BibType=ARTICLE | |BibType=ARTICLE | ||
| − | |Author(s)=Tsuvoshi Ono; Sandra A Thompson; Yumi Sasaki | + | |Author(s)=Tsuvoshi Ono; Sandra A. Thompson; Yumi Sasaki |
|Title=Japanese negotiation through emerging final particles in everyday talk | |Title=Japanese negotiation through emerging final particles in everyday talk | ||
| − | |Tag(s)=Interactional Linguistics; | + | |Tag(s)=Interactional Linguistics; Japanese; |
|Key=Ono2012 | |Key=Ono2012 | ||
|Year=2012 | |Year=2012 | ||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
|Volume=49 | |Volume=49 | ||
|Number=3-4 | |Number=3-4 | ||
| − | |Pages= | + | |Pages=243–272 |
| + | |URL=http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/0163853X.2012.664759 | ||
| + | |DOI=10.1080/0163853X.2012.664759 | ||
| + | |Abstract=This article focuses on the grammar of Japanese kara ‘because/so’ and kedo ‘but’, traditionally understood as conjunctive particles whose function is to mark a “subordinate” clause and connect it to a following “main” clause. This article shows that, in conversation, these forms are often used turn-finally without an apparent main clause and that they are grammaticizing into final particles functioning to yield a turn. Then lexicalized uses of kara ‘because/so’ exploited for turn continuation purposes are considered, showing that different uses of kara ‘because/so’ reflect various stages of its ongoing change. It is argued that the lexicalized independent conjunction dakara is developing from a “consequential” conjunctive particle connecting two clauses to an independent “non-consequential” form. This article shows that this non-consequential form is used for giving explanations for an assertion in an immediately preceding turn and for (re)claiming a turn. Findings shed light on the grammar of turn continuation and highlight the diachronically and synchronically emergent nature of Japanese interactants' grammar. | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 12:44, 24 February 2016
| Ono2012 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Ono2012 |
| Author(s) | Tsuvoshi Ono, Sandra A. Thompson, Yumi Sasaki |
| Title | Japanese negotiation through emerging final particles in everyday talk |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | Interactional Linguistics, Japanese |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2012 |
| Language | |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Discourse Processes |
| Volume | 49 |
| Number | 3-4 |
| Pages | 243–272 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1080/0163853X.2012.664759 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
This article focuses on the grammar of Japanese kara ‘because/so’ and kedo ‘but’, traditionally understood as conjunctive particles whose function is to mark a “subordinate” clause and connect it to a following “main” clause. This article shows that, in conversation, these forms are often used turn-finally without an apparent main clause and that they are grammaticizing into final particles functioning to yield a turn. Then lexicalized uses of kara ‘because/so’ exploited for turn continuation purposes are considered, showing that different uses of kara ‘because/so’ reflect various stages of its ongoing change. It is argued that the lexicalized independent conjunction dakara is developing from a “consequential” conjunctive particle connecting two clauses to an independent “non-consequential” form. This article shows that this non-consequential form is used for giving explanations for an assertion in an immediately preceding turn and for (re)claiming a turn. Findings shed light on the grammar of turn continuation and highlight the diachronically and synchronically emergent nature of Japanese interactants' grammar.
Notes
