Difference between revisions of "Pomerantz1990"
SaulAlbert (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Anita Pomerantz |Title=Conversation analytic claims |Tag(s)=Basic Resources; |Key=Pomerantz1990 |Year=1990 |Journal=Communication Monog...") |
|||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
|Author(s)=Anita Pomerantz | |Author(s)=Anita Pomerantz | ||
|Title=Conversation analytic claims | |Title=Conversation analytic claims | ||
| − | |Tag(s)=Basic Resources; | + | |Tag(s)=Basic Resources; Conversation Analysis; |
|Key=Pomerantz1990 | |Key=Pomerantz1990 | ||
|Year=1990 | |Year=1990 | ||
| + | |Language=English | ||
|Journal=Communication Monographs | |Journal=Communication Monographs | ||
|Volume=57 | |Volume=57 | ||
| − | |Pages= | + | |Number=3 |
| + | |Pages=231–235 | ||
| + | |URL=http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/03637759009376198 | ||
| + | |DOI=10.1080/03637759009376198 | ||
| + | |Note=This is cited widely as "Chautauqua: On the validity and generalizability of conversational analysis methods", although looking at the on-line edition, this seems to be a misattribution of the section title that includes a number of articles including Pomerantz': http://www.tandfonline.com/toc/rcmm20/57/3#.VIROCFRJXUY | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 06:02, 31 May 2018
| Pomerantz1990 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Pomerantz1990 |
| Author(s) | Anita Pomerantz |
| Title | Conversation analytic claims |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | Basic Resources, Conversation Analysis |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 1990 |
| Language | English |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Communication Monographs |
| Volume | 57 |
| Number | 3 |
| Pages | 231–235 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1080/03637759009376198 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
Notes
This is cited widely as "Chautauqua: On the validity and generalizability of conversational analysis methods", although looking at the on-line edition, this seems to be a misattribution of the section title that includes a number of articles including Pomerantz': http://www.tandfonline.com/toc/rcmm20/57/3#.VIROCFRJXUY
