Difference between revisions of "Speer2009a"
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) m (AndreiKorbut moved page Speer2010 to Speer2009a without leaving a redirect) |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
|BibType=INCOLLECTION | |BibType=INCOLLECTION | ||
|Author(s)=Susan A. Speer; | |Author(s)=Susan A. Speer; | ||
| − | |Title=Pursuing views and testing commitments: | + | |Title=Pursuing views and testing commitments: hypothetical questions in the psychiatric assessment of transsexual patients |
| − | |Editor(s)= | + | |Editor(s)=Alice F. Freed; Susan Ehrlich; |
|Tag(s)=EMCA; Institutional talk; questions; transsexual; psychiatry; Medical EMCA | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Institutional talk; questions; transsexual; psychiatry; Medical EMCA | ||
| − | |Key= | + | |Key=Speer2009a |
|Publisher=Oxford University Press | |Publisher=Oxford University Press | ||
| − | |Year= | + | |Year=2009 |
|Address=Oxford | |Address=Oxford | ||
| − | |Booktitle= | + | |Booktitle=“Why Do You Ask?”: The Function of Questions in Institutional Discourse |
|Pages=133–158 | |Pages=133–158 | ||
| + | |URL=https://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195306897.001.0001/acprof-9780195306897-chapter-7 | ||
| + | |DOI=10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195306897.003.0007 | ||
|ISBN=978-0-19-530689-7 | |ISBN=978-0-19-530689-7 | ||
| + | |Abstract=This chapter, written by Susan Speer, considers the role of hypothetical questions (HQs) in interactions between psychiatrists and transsexual patients in a British gender identity clinic. The psychiatrists studied in this chapter perform a gatekeeping function vis‐à‐vis their transsexual patients in that they must diagnosis the patients as true transsexuals before the patients can receive publically funded sex reassignment surgery. Speers argues that the psychiatrists use hypothetical questions in this context as a diagnostic tool, specifically, as a way of testing the patients' commitment to a sex change. In particular, the psychiatrists use HQs to construct hypothetical scenarios about the negative consequences of treatment and query the patients as to how they would “feel, behave, or cope” given such a scenario. | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 12:23, 25 November 2019
| Speer2009a | |
|---|---|
| BibType | INCOLLECTION |
| Key | Speer2009a |
| Author(s) | Susan A. Speer |
| Title | Pursuing views and testing commitments: hypothetical questions in the psychiatric assessment of transsexual patients |
| Editor(s) | Alice F. Freed, Susan Ehrlich |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, Institutional talk, questions, transsexual, psychiatry, Medical EMCA |
| Publisher | Oxford University Press |
| Year | 2009 |
| Language | |
| City | Oxford |
| Month | |
| Journal | |
| Volume | |
| Number | |
| Pages | 133–158 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195306897.003.0007 |
| ISBN | 978-0-19-530689-7 |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | “Why Do You Ask?”: The Function of Questions in Institutional Discourse |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
This chapter, written by Susan Speer, considers the role of hypothetical questions (HQs) in interactions between psychiatrists and transsexual patients in a British gender identity clinic. The psychiatrists studied in this chapter perform a gatekeeping function vis‐à‐vis their transsexual patients in that they must diagnosis the patients as true transsexuals before the patients can receive publically funded sex reassignment surgery. Speers argues that the psychiatrists use hypothetical questions in this context as a diagnostic tool, specifically, as a way of testing the patients' commitment to a sex change. In particular, the psychiatrists use HQs to construct hypothetical scenarios about the negative consequences of treatment and query the patients as to how they would “feel, behave, or cope” given such a scenario.
Notes
