Difference between revisions of "Kelly2019"
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
|BibType=ARTICLE | |BibType=ARTICLE | ||
|Author(s)=Russell Kelly | |Author(s)=Russell Kelly | ||
| − | |Title=“It’s | + | |Title=“It’s over there. sit down”: indexicality, the mundane, the ordinary and the everyday, and much, much more |
|Tag(s)=EMCA; Ethnomethodology; Garfinkel; Goffman; Symbolic interactionism; Indexicality; Order; Order*; No time out | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Ethnomethodology; Garfinkel; Goffman; Symbolic interactionism; Indexicality; Order; Order*; No time out | ||
|Key=Kelly2019 | |Key=Kelly2019 | ||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
|Pages=199–219 | |Pages=199–219 | ||
|URL=https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10746-019-09511-9 | |URL=https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10746-019-09511-9 | ||
| − | |DOI= | + | |DOI=10.1007/s10746-019-09511-9 |
|Abstract=Setting out to understand “indexicality” and its significance in Ethnomethodology, it is first necessary to trace the history of the ideas of Harold Garfinkel. From his early commitment to find “order” in his Harvard dissertation, Garfinkel finds himself in California defending Parsons’ Structural Functionalism while confronting Goffman and Symbolic Interactionism, based in Simmelian, Schützian Sociology. From the audience of students shared with Goffman, Garfinkel puts aside the “situation” of Symbolic Interaction in favour of a process, “Indexicality”, abandoning theorising in favour of ethnomethodology as the means to understand “order*”. This paper, then, demonstrates how indexicality works and proposes completing the tasks that Garfinkel set out in the Studies to disclose the taken-for-granted, the left out, bounded by caveats like No-Time-Out and For-all-practical purposes. | |Abstract=Setting out to understand “indexicality” and its significance in Ethnomethodology, it is first necessary to trace the history of the ideas of Harold Garfinkel. From his early commitment to find “order” in his Harvard dissertation, Garfinkel finds himself in California defending Parsons’ Structural Functionalism while confronting Goffman and Symbolic Interactionism, based in Simmelian, Schützian Sociology. From the audience of students shared with Goffman, Garfinkel puts aside the “situation” of Symbolic Interaction in favour of a process, “Indexicality”, abandoning theorising in favour of ethnomethodology as the means to understand “order*”. This paper, then, demonstrates how indexicality works and proposes completing the tasks that Garfinkel set out in the Studies to disclose the taken-for-granted, the left out, bounded by caveats like No-Time-Out and For-all-practical purposes. | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 01:11, 19 January 2020
| Kelly2019 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Kelly2019 |
| Author(s) | Russell Kelly |
| Title | “It’s over there. sit down”: indexicality, the mundane, the ordinary and the everyday, and much, much more |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, Ethnomethodology, Garfinkel, Goffman, Symbolic interactionism, Indexicality, Order, Order*, No time out |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2019 |
| Language | English |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Human Studies |
| Volume | 42 |
| Number | 2 |
| Pages | 199–219 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1007/s10746-019-09511-9 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
Setting out to understand “indexicality” and its significance in Ethnomethodology, it is first necessary to trace the history of the ideas of Harold Garfinkel. From his early commitment to find “order” in his Harvard dissertation, Garfinkel finds himself in California defending Parsons’ Structural Functionalism while confronting Goffman and Symbolic Interactionism, based in Simmelian, Schützian Sociology. From the audience of students shared with Goffman, Garfinkel puts aside the “situation” of Symbolic Interaction in favour of a process, “Indexicality”, abandoning theorising in favour of ethnomethodology as the means to understand “order*”. This paper, then, demonstrates how indexicality works and proposes completing the tasks that Garfinkel set out in the Studies to disclose the taken-for-granted, the left out, bounded by caveats like No-Time-Out and For-all-practical purposes.
Notes
