Difference between revisions of "Ruhlemann2019"
SaulAlbert (talk | contribs) (BibTeX auto import 2019-07-17 10:52:40) |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{BibEntry | {{BibEntry | ||
| + | |BibType=ARTICLE | ||
| + | |Author(s)=Christoph Rühlemann; Matt Gee; Alexander Ptak; | ||
| + | |Title=Alternating gaze in multi-party storytelling | ||
| + | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Gaze alternation; Inclusion; Stance; Storytelling; Storytelling components; XML | ||
|Key=Ruhlemann2019 | |Key=Ruhlemann2019 | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
|Year=2019 | |Year=2019 | ||
| − | | | + | |Language=English |
|Journal=Journal of Pragmatics | |Journal=Journal of Pragmatics | ||
|Volume=149 | |Volume=149 | ||
| − | |Pages= | + | |Pages=91–113 |
| + | |URL=https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0378216617303326 | ||
|DOI=10.1016/j.pragma.2019.06.001 | |DOI=10.1016/j.pragma.2019.06.001 | ||
|Abstract=We present a single case study on gaze alternation in three-party storytelling. The study makes use of the XML method, a `combinatorial approach' (Haugh and Musgrave, 2019) involving multi-modal CA transcription converted into the XML syntax. We approach gaze alternation via (i) the addressee-status hypothesis, (ii) the texturing hypothesis, and (iii) the acceleration hypothesis. Hypothesis (i) proposes that the storyteller alternatingly looks at the recipients not only when their addressee status is symmetrical but also when their addressee status is asymmetrical. Hypothesis (ii) predicts that gaze alternation `textures' the telling by occurring when the storytelling progresses from one segment to another. Hypothesis (iii) states that gaze alternation accelerates toward Climax and decelerates in Post-completion sequences. The analyses support the hypotheses. They suggest that alternating gaze works against the danger of exclusion caused by the dyadic structure of conversation. It further partakes in story organization as it occurs at points of transition from one story section to another section. Finally, accelerated gaze alternation constitutes an indexical process drawing the recipients' attention to the immediate relevance of stance display (Stivers, 2008). We conclude that the three hypotheses warrant further investigation to determine their generalizability across speakers and speech situations. | |Abstract=We present a single case study on gaze alternation in three-party storytelling. The study makes use of the XML method, a `combinatorial approach' (Haugh and Musgrave, 2019) involving multi-modal CA transcription converted into the XML syntax. We approach gaze alternation via (i) the addressee-status hypothesis, (ii) the texturing hypothesis, and (iii) the acceleration hypothesis. Hypothesis (i) proposes that the storyteller alternatingly looks at the recipients not only when their addressee status is symmetrical but also when their addressee status is asymmetrical. Hypothesis (ii) predicts that gaze alternation `textures' the telling by occurring when the storytelling progresses from one segment to another. Hypothesis (iii) states that gaze alternation accelerates toward Climax and decelerates in Post-completion sequences. The analyses support the hypotheses. They suggest that alternating gaze works against the danger of exclusion caused by the dyadic structure of conversation. It further partakes in story organization as it occurs at points of transition from one story section to another section. Finally, accelerated gaze alternation constitutes an indexical process drawing the recipients' attention to the immediate relevance of stance display (Stivers, 2008). We conclude that the three hypotheses warrant further investigation to determine their generalizability across speakers and speech situations. | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 08:53, 15 January 2020
| Ruhlemann2019 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Ruhlemann2019 |
| Author(s) | Christoph Rühlemann, Matt Gee, Alexander Ptak |
| Title | Alternating gaze in multi-party storytelling |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, Gaze alternation, Inclusion, Stance, Storytelling, Storytelling components, XML |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2019 |
| Language | English |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Journal of Pragmatics |
| Volume | 149 |
| Number | |
| Pages | 91–113 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.pragma.2019.06.001 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
We present a single case study on gaze alternation in three-party storytelling. The study makes use of the XML method, a `combinatorial approach' (Haugh and Musgrave, 2019) involving multi-modal CA transcription converted into the XML syntax. We approach gaze alternation via (i) the addressee-status hypothesis, (ii) the texturing hypothesis, and (iii) the acceleration hypothesis. Hypothesis (i) proposes that the storyteller alternatingly looks at the recipients not only when their addressee status is symmetrical but also when their addressee status is asymmetrical. Hypothesis (ii) predicts that gaze alternation `textures' the telling by occurring when the storytelling progresses from one segment to another. Hypothesis (iii) states that gaze alternation accelerates toward Climax and decelerates in Post-completion sequences. The analyses support the hypotheses. They suggest that alternating gaze works against the danger of exclusion caused by the dyadic structure of conversation. It further partakes in story organization as it occurs at points of transition from one story section to another section. Finally, accelerated gaze alternation constitutes an indexical process drawing the recipients' attention to the immediate relevance of stance display (Stivers, 2008). We conclude that the three hypotheses warrant further investigation to determine their generalizability across speakers and speech situations.
Notes
