Difference between revisions of "Schubert2019"
BogdanaHuma (talk | contribs) (BibTeX auto import 2019-06-19 10:42:13) |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{BibEntry | {{BibEntry | ||
| − | | | + | |BibType=ARTICLE |
| − | | | + | |Author(s)=Christoph Schubert |
|Title=‘OK, well, first of all, let me say …’: Discursive uses of response initiators in US presidential primary debates | |Title=‘OK, well, first of all, let me say …’: Discursive uses of response initiators in US presidential primary debates | ||
| − | |||
|Tag(s)=common ground; conversation analysis; discourse analysis; discourse marker; election debate; information management; media discourse; persuasion; response initiator; self- and other-presentation; turn-taking; US political discourse; speech acts; turn-initial particles; American English | |Tag(s)=common ground; conversation analysis; discourse analysis; discourse marker; election debate; information management; media discourse; persuasion; response initiator; self- and other-presentation; turn-taking; US political discourse; speech acts; turn-initial particles; American English | ||
| − | | | + | |Key=Schubert2019 |
|Year=2019 | |Year=2019 | ||
| + | |Language=English | ||
|Journal=Discourse Studies | |Journal=Discourse Studies | ||
|Volume=21 | |Volume=21 | ||
|Number=4 | |Number=4 | ||
| − | |Pages= | + | |Pages=438–457 |
| − | |URL=https://doi | + | |URL=https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1461445619842734 |
|DOI=10.1177/1461445619842734 | |DOI=10.1177/1461445619842734 | ||
|Abstract=This article examines the discursive uses of frequent response initiators by Republican and Democratic presidential candidates in the genre of televised US primary debates. Ten full transcripts of debates held between February and April 2016 are investigated from the perspectives of political discourse studies and conversation analysis. It is shown that the response initiators well, first of all, look, you know and let me (just) speech act verb fulfill specific discursive functions in competitive media discourse. On the textual level, candidates exert power and control by negotiating turn-taking processes and managing the information flow. On the interactional level, competitors use response initiators to frame themselves as likable and competent personas, to establish common ground with voters and to enhance negative perceptions of opponents. Conclusively, in the multilogue of election debates, response initiators significantly contribute to the construction of individual preferability. | |Abstract=This article examines the discursive uses of frequent response initiators by Republican and Democratic presidential candidates in the genre of televised US primary debates. Ten full transcripts of debates held between February and April 2016 are investigated from the perspectives of political discourse studies and conversation analysis. It is shown that the response initiators well, first of all, look, you know and let me (just) speech act verb fulfill specific discursive functions in competitive media discourse. On the textual level, candidates exert power and control by negotiating turn-taking processes and managing the information flow. On the interactional level, competitors use response initiators to frame themselves as likable and competent personas, to establish common ground with voters and to enhance negative perceptions of opponents. Conclusively, in the multilogue of election debates, response initiators significantly contribute to the construction of individual preferability. | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 01:40, 16 January 2020
| Schubert2019 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Schubert2019 |
| Author(s) | Christoph Schubert |
| Title | ‘OK, well, first of all, let me say …’: Discursive uses of response initiators in US presidential primary debates |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | common ground, conversation analysis, discourse analysis, discourse marker, election debate, information management, media discourse, persuasion, response initiator, self- and other-presentation, turn-taking, US political discourse, speech acts, turn-initial particles, American English |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2019 |
| Language | English |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Discourse Studies |
| Volume | 21 |
| Number | 4 |
| Pages | 438–457 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1177/1461445619842734 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
This article examines the discursive uses of frequent response initiators by Republican and Democratic presidential candidates in the genre of televised US primary debates. Ten full transcripts of debates held between February and April 2016 are investigated from the perspectives of political discourse studies and conversation analysis. It is shown that the response initiators well, first of all, look, you know and let me (just) speech act verb fulfill specific discursive functions in competitive media discourse. On the textual level, candidates exert power and control by negotiating turn-taking processes and managing the information flow. On the interactional level, competitors use response initiators to frame themselves as likable and competent personas, to establish common ground with voters and to enhance negative perceptions of opponents. Conclusively, in the multilogue of election debates, response initiators significantly contribute to the construction of individual preferability.
Notes
