Difference between revisions of "Strong-etal2008"
PaultenHave (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Tom Strong; Robbie Busch; Shari Couture; |Title=Conversational evidence in therapeutic dialogue |Tag(s)=EMCA; Family Therapy; Applied Co...") |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
|Volume=34 | |Volume=34 | ||
|Number=3 | |Number=3 | ||
| − | |Pages= | + | |Pages=388–405 |
| + | |URL=https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1752-0606.2008.00079.x | ||
|DOI=10.1111/j.1752-0606.2008.00079.x | |DOI=10.1111/j.1752-0606.2008.00079.x | ||
| − | |Abstract=Family therapists’ participation in therapeutic dialogue with clients is typically informed | + | |Abstract=Family therapists’ participation in therapeutic dialogue with clients is typically informed by evidence of how such dialogue is developing. In this article, we propose that conversational evidence, the kind that can be empirically analyzed using discourse analyses, be considered a contribution to widening psychotherapy’s evidence base. After some preliminaries about what we mean by conversational evidence, we provide a genealogy of evaluative practice in psychotherapy, and examine qualitative evaluation methods for their theoretical compatibilities with social constructionist approaches to family therapy. We then move on to examine the notion of accomplishment in therapeutic dialogue given how such accomplishments can be evaluated using conversation analysis. We conclude by considering a number of research and pedagogical implications we associate with conversational evidence. |
| − | by evidence of how such dialogue is developing. In this article, we propose that | ||
| − | |||
| − | considered a contribution to widening psychotherapy’s evidence base. After some | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | theoretical compatibilities with social constructionist approaches to family therapy. We | ||
| − | then move on to examine the notion of accomplishment in therapeutic dialogue given how | ||
| − | such accomplishments can be evaluated using conversation analysis. We conclude by | ||
| − | |||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 12:19, 20 November 2019
| Strong-etal2008 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Strong-etal2008 |
| Author(s) | Tom Strong, Robbie Busch, Shari Couture |
| Title | Conversational evidence in therapeutic dialogue |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, Family Therapy, Applied Conversation Analysis |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2008 |
| Language | English |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Journal of Marital and Family Therapy |
| Volume | 34 |
| Number | 3 |
| Pages | 388–405 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1111/j.1752-0606.2008.00079.x |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
Family therapists’ participation in therapeutic dialogue with clients is typically informed by evidence of how such dialogue is developing. In this article, we propose that conversational evidence, the kind that can be empirically analyzed using discourse analyses, be considered a contribution to widening psychotherapy’s evidence base. After some preliminaries about what we mean by conversational evidence, we provide a genealogy of evaluative practice in psychotherapy, and examine qualitative evaluation methods for their theoretical compatibilities with social constructionist approaches to family therapy. We then move on to examine the notion of accomplishment in therapeutic dialogue given how such accomplishments can be evaluated using conversation analysis. We conclude by considering a number of research and pedagogical implications we associate with conversational evidence.
Notes
