Difference between revisions of "Stokoe2000a"
PaultenHave (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Elisabeth H. Stokoe; |Title=Constructing topicality in university students’ small-group discussion: A conversation analytic approach |...") |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
|BibType=ARTICLE | |BibType=ARTICLE | ||
|Author(s)=Elisabeth H. Stokoe; | |Author(s)=Elisabeth H. Stokoe; | ||
− | |Title=Constructing topicality in university students’ small-group discussion: | + | |Title=Constructing topicality in university students’ small-group discussion: a conversation analytic approach |
|Tag(s)=EMCA; Topical action; Small group | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Topical action; Small group | ||
|Key=Stokoe2000a | |Key=Stokoe2000a | ||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
|Volume=14 | |Volume=14 | ||
|Number=3 | |Number=3 | ||
− | |Pages= | + | |Pages=184–203 |
− | |URL=https://doi | + | |URL=https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09500780008666789 |
|DOI=10.1080/09500780008666789 | |DOI=10.1080/09500780008666789 | ||
− | |Abstract=This paper adopts a conversation analytic approach to the study of educational | + | |Abstract=This paper adopts a conversation analytic approach to the study of educational talk-in-interaction. Specifically, the focus is upon the production of topical talk in a university seminar context. Small groups of students were video-recorded whilst carrying out a discussion task. The data was transcribed and subsequently analysed using conversation analysis. Two related themes were explored. First, the opening sequences of the discussions were analysed and particular attention was paid to the conversational procedures involved in 'getting down to educational business'. Secondly, in order to explore the sorts of topics that students treated as legitimate for educational talk, episodes marked as 'off-topic' were explored. Patterns were identified in both types of topic production. The implications of conversation analytic methodology for the study of educational talk are considered, with particular emphasis on the importance of explicating participants' understandings of the activities in which they are engaged. |
− | talk-in-interaction. Specifically, the focus is upon the production of topical talk in a | ||
− | university seminar context.Small groups of | ||
− | |||
− | conversation analysis.Two | ||
− | of the discussions were analysed and particular attention was paid to the | ||
− | |||
− | order to explore the sorts of topics that students treated as legitimate for educational | ||
− | talk, episodes marked as | ||
− | types of topic production. The implications of conversation analytic methodology for | ||
− | the study of educational talk are considered, with particular emphasis on the | ||
− | |||
− | engaged. | ||
}} | }} |
Latest revision as of 11:29, 27 October 2019
Stokoe2000a | |
---|---|
BibType | ARTICLE |
Key | Stokoe2000a |
Author(s) | Elisabeth H. Stokoe |
Title | Constructing topicality in university students’ small-group discussion: a conversation analytic approach |
Editor(s) | |
Tag(s) | EMCA, Topical action, Small group |
Publisher | |
Year | 2000 |
Language | English |
City | |
Month | |
Journal | Language and Education |
Volume | 14 |
Number | 3 |
Pages | 184–203 |
URL | Link |
DOI | 10.1080/09500780008666789 |
ISBN | |
Organization | |
Institution | |
School | |
Type | |
Edition | |
Series | |
Howpublished | |
Book title | |
Chapter |
Abstract
This paper adopts a conversation analytic approach to the study of educational talk-in-interaction. Specifically, the focus is upon the production of topical talk in a university seminar context. Small groups of students were video-recorded whilst carrying out a discussion task. The data was transcribed and subsequently analysed using conversation analysis. Two related themes were explored. First, the opening sequences of the discussions were analysed and particular attention was paid to the conversational procedures involved in 'getting down to educational business'. Secondly, in order to explore the sorts of topics that students treated as legitimate for educational talk, episodes marked as 'off-topic' were explored. Patterns were identified in both types of topic production. The implications of conversation analytic methodology for the study of educational talk are considered, with particular emphasis on the importance of explicating participants' understandings of the activities in which they are engaged.
Notes