Difference between revisions of "Sidnell2008"
PaultenHave (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Jack Sidnell; |Title=Alternate and complementary perspectives on language and social life: The organization of repair in two Caribbean c...") |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
|BibType=ARTICLE | |BibType=ARTICLE | ||
|Author(s)=Jack Sidnell; | |Author(s)=Jack Sidnell; | ||
− | |Title=Alternate and complementary perspectives on language and social life: The organization of repair in two Caribbean | + | |Title=Alternate and complementary perspectives on language and social life: The organization of repair in two Caribbean communities |
|Tag(s)=EMCA; Conversation analysis; linguistic anthropology; repair; comparative studies; Caribbean | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Conversation analysis; linguistic anthropology; repair; comparative studies; Caribbean | ||
|Key=Sidnell2008 | |Key=Sidnell2008 | ||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
|Volume=12 | |Volume=12 | ||
|Number=4 | |Number=4 | ||
− | |Pages= | + | |Pages=477–503 |
− | |Abstract=This article discusses the history of relations between conversation analysis | + | |URL=https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1467-9841.2008.00377.x |
− | and linguistic anthropology within the broader field encompassing various | + | |DOI=10.1111/j.1467-9841.2008.00377.x |
− | approaches to language, interaction, and social life. It argues that although | + | |Abstract=This article discusses the history of relations between conversation analysis and linguistic anthropology within the broader field encompassing various approaches to language, interaction, and social life. It argues that although these relations have, at times, been fraught and marked by rather serious misconceptions of what conversation analysis is all about, there is still much to be gained from cooperation and scholarly exchange between these approaches. An illustration of this argument focuses on the organization of other‐initiated repair in two Caribbean communities. |
− | these relations have, at times, been fraught and marked by rather serious | ||
− | misconceptions of what conversation analysis is all about, there is still | ||
− | much to be gained from cooperation and scholarly exchange between these | ||
− | approaches. An illustration of this argument focuses on the organization of | ||
− | |||
}} | }} |
Latest revision as of 11:25, 20 November 2019
Sidnell2008 | |
---|---|
BibType | ARTICLE |
Key | Sidnell2008 |
Author(s) | Jack Sidnell |
Title | Alternate and complementary perspectives on language and social life: The organization of repair in two Caribbean communities |
Editor(s) | |
Tag(s) | EMCA, Conversation analysis, linguistic anthropology, repair, comparative studies, Caribbean |
Publisher | |
Year | 2008 |
Language | English |
City | |
Month | |
Journal | Journal of Sociolinguistics |
Volume | 12 |
Number | 4 |
Pages | 477–503 |
URL | Link |
DOI | 10.1111/j.1467-9841.2008.00377.x |
ISBN | |
Organization | |
Institution | |
School | |
Type | |
Edition | |
Series | |
Howpublished | |
Book title | |
Chapter |
Abstract
This article discusses the history of relations between conversation analysis and linguistic anthropology within the broader field encompassing various approaches to language, interaction, and social life. It argues that although these relations have, at times, been fraught and marked by rather serious misconceptions of what conversation analysis is all about, there is still much to be gained from cooperation and scholarly exchange between these approaches. An illustration of this argument focuses on the organization of other‐initiated repair in two Caribbean communities.
Notes