Difference between revisions of "Derry-etal2010"

From emcawiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Sharon J. Derry; Roy D. Pea; Brigid Barron; Randi A. Engle; Frederick Erickson; Ricki Goldman; Rogers Hall; Timothy Koschmann; Jay L. Le...")
 
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
 
|BibType=ARTICLE
 
|BibType=ARTICLE
 
|Author(s)=Sharon J. Derry; Roy D. Pea; Brigid Barron; Randi A. Engle; Frederick Erickson; Ricki Goldman; Rogers Hall; Timothy Koschmann; Jay L. Lemke; Miriam Gamoran Sherin; Bruce L. Sherin;
 
|Author(s)=Sharon J. Derry; Roy D. Pea; Brigid Barron; Randi A. Engle; Frederick Erickson; Ricki Goldman; Rogers Hall; Timothy Koschmann; Jay L. Lemke; Miriam Gamoran Sherin; Bruce L. Sherin;
−
|Title=Conducting Video Research in the Learning Sciences: Guidance on Selection, Analysis, Technology, and Ethics
+
|Title=Conducting video research in the learning sciences: guidance on selection, analysis, technology, and ethics
−
|Tag(s)=EMCA; Video-recorded interaction; Video Methods; Video Analysis
+
|Tag(s)=EMCA; Video-recorded interaction; Video Methods; Video Analysis; Data management
 
|Key=Derry-etal2010
 
|Key=Derry-etal2010
 
|Year=2010
 
|Year=2010
Line 9: Line 9:
 
|Journal=Journal of the Learning Sciences
 
|Journal=Journal of the Learning Sciences
 
|Volume=19
 
|Volume=19
 +
|Number=1
 
|Pages=3–53
 
|Pages=3–53
 +
|URL=https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/10508400903452884
 
|DOI=10.1080/10508400903452884
 
|DOI=10.1080/10508400903452884
−
|Abstract=The goal of this contribution is to provide guidance for researchers conducting
+
|Abstract=Focusing on expanding technical capabilities and new collaborative possibilities, we address 4 challenges for scientists who collect and use video records to conduct research in and on complex learning environments: (a) Selection: How can researchers be systematic in deciding which elements of a complex environment or extensive video corpus to select for study? (b) Analysis: What analytical frameworks and practices are appropriate for given research problems? (c) Technology: What technologies are available and what new tools must be developed to support collecting, archiving, analyzing, reporting, and collaboratively sharing video? and (d) Ethics: How can research protocols encourage broad video sharing and reuse while adequately protecting the rights of research participants who are recorded?
−
(a) studies that use video to closely examine teaching and learning in learning en-
 
−
vironments such as classrooms, the goals of which are to understand learning pro-
 
−
cesses and better design formal learning environments; and (b) studies using video
 
−
for in-depth analyses of peer and adult–child interactions in informal settings, such
 
−
as museums and homes, the goals of which are to help researchers and developers
 
−
understand informal learning as it occurs naturally in various contexts and to
 
−
achieve better informal settings for learning.We collaborated to provide a careful
 
−
discussion of principles, strategies, and important issues that should inform re-
 
−
searchers’ choices at all points in the video research process.1 We tried to develop
 
−
these guidelines without favoring any particular methodological orientation or set
 
−
of methods. The learning sciences is an interdisciplinary field, and video is a tool
 
−
that enhances various methodologies associated with different, and some would
 
−
argue incommensurate, philosophical orientations. These include ethnography,
 
−
ethnomethodology, experimentation, discourse analysis, interaction analysis, and
 
−
others. But regardless of a researcher’s methodological orientation or specific re-
 
−
search goals, video offers a means of close documentation and observation and
 
−
presents unprecedented analytical, collaborative, and archival possibilities, aswell
 
−
as new problems. Researchers with different methodological orientations and
 
−
goals confront many common challenges among those that we address.
 
 
}}
 
}}

Latest revision as of 05:49, 25 March 2021

Derry-etal2010
BibType ARTICLE
Key Derry-etal2010
Author(s) Sharon J. Derry, Roy D. Pea, Brigid Barron, Randi A. Engle, Frederick Erickson, Ricki Goldman, Rogers Hall, Timothy Koschmann, Jay L. Lemke, Miriam Gamoran Sherin, Bruce L. Sherin
Title Conducting video research in the learning sciences: guidance on selection, analysis, technology, and ethics
Editor(s)
Tag(s) EMCA, Video-recorded interaction, Video Methods, Video Analysis, Data management
Publisher
Year 2010
Language English
City
Month
Journal Journal of the Learning Sciences
Volume 19
Number 1
Pages 3–53
URL Link
DOI 10.1080/10508400903452884
ISBN
Organization
Institution
School
Type
Edition
Series
Howpublished
Book title
Chapter

Download BibTex

Abstract

Focusing on expanding technical capabilities and new collaborative possibilities, we address 4 challenges for scientists who collect and use video records to conduct research in and on complex learning environments: (a) Selection: How can researchers be systematic in deciding which elements of a complex environment or extensive video corpus to select for study? (b) Analysis: What analytical frameworks and practices are appropriate for given research problems? (c) Technology: What technologies are available and what new tools must be developed to support collecting, archiving, analyzing, reporting, and collaboratively sharing video? and (d) Ethics: How can research protocols encourage broad video sharing and reuse while adequately protecting the rights of research participants who are recorded?

Notes


Retrieved from "https://emcawiki.net/index.php?title=Derry-etal2010&oldid=27325"