Difference between revisions of "Parish2019"
ElliottHoey (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=INCOLLECTION |Author(s)=Nicole Parish |Title=Does This Child Have Autism? Exploring Team Discussions When Diagnosing Autistic Spectrum Disorder |Editor(s)=...") |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
|BibType=INCOLLECTION | |BibType=INCOLLECTION | ||
|Author(s)=Nicole Parish | |Author(s)=Nicole Parish | ||
| − | |Title=Does | + | |Title=Does this child have autism?: exploring team discussions when diagnosing autistic spectrum disorder |
| − | |Editor(s)= | + | |Editor(s)=Cordet Smart; Timothy Auburn |
|Tag(s)=EMCA; ASD; Children; Meetings; Diagnosis | |Tag(s)=EMCA; ASD; Children; Meetings; Diagnosis | ||
|Key=Parish2019 | |Key=Parish2019 | ||
| + | |Publisher=Palgrave Macmillan | ||
|Year=2019 | |Year=2019 | ||
|Language=English | |Language=English | ||
| − | |Booktitle=Interprofessional Care and Mental Health | + | |Address=Cham |
| − | |Pages= | + | |Booktitle=Interprofessional Care and Mental Health: A Discursive Exploration of Team Meeting Practices |
| + | |Pages=169–191 | ||
|URL=https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-98228-1_8 | |URL=https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-98228-1_8 | ||
| − | |DOI= | + | |DOI=10.1007/978-3-319-98228-1_8 |
|Abstract=Parish reports a study of the social organisation of team meetings that decide whether to give a child a diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder (ASD). There is currently little known about the use of multidisciplinary team (MDT) approach, despite the strong recommendations for such an approach to be used when assessing for ASD. Three meetings from two MDTs were recorded, capturing the discussion of 16 children. Conversation analysis revealed three practices that encouraged information to be elaborated upon, even in time-pressured meetings. These ‘opened up’ the team discussions to consider different possible explanations for a child’s presentation. Parish concludes by discussing the clinical implications of these practices, including whether they could reduce the risk of over-diagnosing ASD. | |Abstract=Parish reports a study of the social organisation of team meetings that decide whether to give a child a diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder (ASD). There is currently little known about the use of multidisciplinary team (MDT) approach, despite the strong recommendations for such an approach to be used when assessing for ASD. Three meetings from two MDTs were recorded, capturing the discussion of 16 children. Conversation analysis revealed three practices that encouraged information to be elaborated upon, even in time-pressured meetings. These ‘opened up’ the team discussions to consider different possible explanations for a child’s presentation. Parish concludes by discussing the clinical implications of these practices, including whether they could reduce the risk of over-diagnosing ASD. | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 08:48, 17 January 2020
| Parish2019 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | INCOLLECTION |
| Key | Parish2019 |
| Author(s) | Nicole Parish |
| Title | Does this child have autism?: exploring team discussions when diagnosing autistic spectrum disorder |
| Editor(s) | Cordet Smart, Timothy Auburn |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, ASD, Children, Meetings, Diagnosis |
| Publisher | Palgrave Macmillan |
| Year | 2019 |
| Language | English |
| City | Cham |
| Month | |
| Journal | |
| Volume | |
| Number | |
| Pages | 169–191 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1007/978-3-319-98228-1_8 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | Interprofessional Care and Mental Health: A Discursive Exploration of Team Meeting Practices |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
Parish reports a study of the social organisation of team meetings that decide whether to give a child a diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder (ASD). There is currently little known about the use of multidisciplinary team (MDT) approach, despite the strong recommendations for such an approach to be used when assessing for ASD. Three meetings from two MDTs were recorded, capturing the discussion of 16 children. Conversation analysis revealed three practices that encouraged information to be elaborated upon, even in time-pressured meetings. These ‘opened up’ the team discussions to consider different possible explanations for a child’s presentation. Parish concludes by discussing the clinical implications of these practices, including whether they could reduce the risk of over-diagnosing ASD.
Notes
