Difference between revisions of "LeBlanc2018"
ElliottHoey (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=H. Paul LeBlanc III |Title=Communicating Inclusion: An Analysis of Family Conversation |Tag(s)=EMCA; Inclusion; Family; Ethnomethodology...") |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
|BibType=ARTICLE | |BibType=ARTICLE | ||
|Author(s)=H. Paul LeBlanc III | |Author(s)=H. Paul LeBlanc III | ||
| − | |Title=Communicating | + | |Title=Communicating inclusion: an analysis of family conversation |
|Tag(s)=EMCA; Inclusion; Family; Ethnomethodology | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Inclusion; Family; Ethnomethodology | ||
|Key=LeBlanc2018 | |Key=LeBlanc2018 | ||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
|Volume=6 | |Volume=6 | ||
|Number=2 | |Number=2 | ||
| − | |Pages= | + | |Pages=1–11 |
|URL=http://ijlcnet.com/journals/ijlc/Vol_6_No_2_December_2018/1.pdf | |URL=http://ijlcnet.com/journals/ijlc/Vol_6_No_2_December_2018/1.pdf | ||
| − | |DOI= | + | |DOI=10.15640/ijlc.v6n2a1 |
| − | |Abstract=Prior studies into human interaction from an ethnomethodological perspective have demonstrated that individuals create, define, negotiate, maintain, and therefore "do" relationship through interaction which is regularly patterned and organized. Based upon Mandebaum’s (1987) notion of coupleness, the current study extends the definition beyond the dyad to the larger group of family. Families, comprised of individuals in relation to each other, interact in ways that can be directly observed and therefore demonstrate the "doing" of | + | |Abstract=Prior studies into human interaction from an ethnomethodological perspective have demonstrated that individuals create, define, negotiate, maintain, and therefore "do" relationship through interaction which is regularly patterned and organized. Based upon Mandebaum’s (1987) notion of coupleness, the current study extends the definition beyond the dyad to the larger group of family. Families, comprised of individuals in relation to each other, interact in ways that can be directly observed and therefore demonstrate the "doing" of family. This study uses conversation analytic techniques, applied to an actual, naturalistic family interaction, to |
| − | family. This study uses conversation analytic techniques, applied to an actual, naturalistic family interaction, to | + | examine how a family defines itself through interaction. The study demonstrates that the relationships of family are performed through inclusive tactics and strategies such as the co-telling of co-participated events, requests for information about daily activities, planning of future shared events, and shared attempts at the construction of meaning. The study discusses the strengths and weaknesses of conversation analytic techniques in examining relational communication. |
| − | examine how a family defines itself through interaction. The study demonstrates that the relationships of | ||
| − | family are performed through inclusive tactics and strategies such as the co-telling of co-participated events, | ||
| − | requests for information about daily activities, planning of future shared events, and shared attempts at the | ||
| − | construction of meaning. The study discusses the strengths and weaknesses of conversation analytic techniques in examining relational communication | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 03:17, 13 January 2020
| LeBlanc2018 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | LeBlanc2018 |
| Author(s) | H. Paul LeBlanc III |
| Title | Communicating inclusion: an analysis of family conversation |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, Inclusion, Family, Ethnomethodology |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2018 |
| Language | English |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | International Journal of Linguistics and Communication |
| Volume | 6 |
| Number | 2 |
| Pages | 1–11 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.15640/ijlc.v6n2a1 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
Prior studies into human interaction from an ethnomethodological perspective have demonstrated that individuals create, define, negotiate, maintain, and therefore "do" relationship through interaction which is regularly patterned and organized. Based upon Mandebaum’s (1987) notion of coupleness, the current study extends the definition beyond the dyad to the larger group of family. Families, comprised of individuals in relation to each other, interact in ways that can be directly observed and therefore demonstrate the "doing" of family. This study uses conversation analytic techniques, applied to an actual, naturalistic family interaction, to examine how a family defines itself through interaction. The study demonstrates that the relationships of family are performed through inclusive tactics and strategies such as the co-telling of co-participated events, requests for information about daily activities, planning of future shared events, and shared attempts at the construction of meaning. The study discusses the strengths and weaknesses of conversation analytic techniques in examining relational communication.
Notes
