Difference between revisions of "Stivers2010a"
PaultenHave (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Tanya Stivers; |Title=An overview of the question–response system in American English conversation |Tag(s)=EMCA; Question-response sys...") |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
|Journal=Journal of Pragmatics | |Journal=Journal of Pragmatics | ||
|Volume=42 | |Volume=42 | ||
+ | |Number=10 | ||
|Pages=2772–2781 | |Pages=2772–2781 | ||
+ | |URL=https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0378216610001074 | ||
|DOI=10.1016/j.pragma.2010.04.011 | |DOI=10.1016/j.pragma.2010.04.011 | ||
− | |Abstract=This article, part of a 10 language comparative project on question–response sequences, | + | |Abstract=This article, part of a 10 language comparative project on question–response sequences, discusses these sequences in American English conversation. The data are video-taped spontaneous naturally occurring conversations involving two to five adults. Relying on these data I document the basic distributional patterns of types of questions asked (polar, Q-word or alternative as well as sub-types), types of social actions implemented by these questions (e.g., repair initiations, requests for confirmation, offers or requests for information), and types of responses (e.g., repetitional answers or yes/no tokens). I show that declarative questions are used more commonly in conversation than would be suspected by traditional grammars of English and questions are used for a wider range of functions than grammars would suggest. Finally, this article offers distributional support for the idea that responses that are better “fitted” with the question are preferred. |
− | discusses these sequences in American English conversation. The data are video-taped | ||
− | spontaneous naturally occurring conversations involving two to | ||
− | these data I document the basic distributional patterns of types of questions asked (polar, | ||
− | Q-word or alternative as well as sub-types), types of social actions implemented by these | ||
− | questions (e.g., repair initiations, requests for | ||
− | information), and types of responses (e.g., repetitional answers or yes/no tokens). I show | ||
− | that declarative questions are used more commonly in conversation than would be | ||
− | suspected by traditional grammars of English and questions are used for a wider range of | ||
− | functions than grammars would suggest. Finally, this article offers distributional support | ||
− | for the idea that responses that are better | ||
}} | }} |
Latest revision as of 00:05, 25 November 2019
Stivers2010a | |
---|---|
BibType | ARTICLE |
Key | Stivers2010a |
Author(s) | Tanya Stivers |
Title | An overview of the question–response system in American English conversation |
Editor(s) | |
Tag(s) | EMCA, Question-response system, American English, Questions, Polar (yes/no) questions, Content (WH) questions, Conversation |
Publisher | |
Year | 2010 |
Language | English |
City | |
Month | |
Journal | Journal of Pragmatics |
Volume | 42 |
Number | 10 |
Pages | 2772–2781 |
URL | Link |
DOI | 10.1016/j.pragma.2010.04.011 |
ISBN | |
Organization | |
Institution | |
School | |
Type | |
Edition | |
Series | |
Howpublished | |
Book title | |
Chapter |
Abstract
This article, part of a 10 language comparative project on question–response sequences, discusses these sequences in American English conversation. The data are video-taped spontaneous naturally occurring conversations involving two to five adults. Relying on these data I document the basic distributional patterns of types of questions asked (polar, Q-word or alternative as well as sub-types), types of social actions implemented by these questions (e.g., repair initiations, requests for confirmation, offers or requests for information), and types of responses (e.g., repetitional answers or yes/no tokens). I show that declarative questions are used more commonly in conversation than would be suspected by traditional grammars of English and questions are used for a wider range of functions than grammars would suggest. Finally, this article offers distributional support for the idea that responses that are better “fitted” with the question are preferred.
Notes