Difference between revisions of "Garafanga2018"
ElliottHoey (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=INCOLLECTION |Author(s)=Joseph Gafaranga |Title=Overall order versus local order in bilingual conversation: A conversation analytic perspective on language...") |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
|Tag(s)=EMCA; Bilingualism; Language alternation; Code-alternation; Overall structural organization; Preference; Transitions | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Bilingualism; Language alternation; Code-alternation; Overall structural organization; Preference; Transitions | ||
|Key=Garafanga2018 | |Key=Garafanga2018 | ||
| + | |Publisher=John Benjamins | ||
|Year=2018 | |Year=2018 | ||
|Language=English | |Language=English | ||
| + | |Address=Amsterdam | ||
|Booktitle=Conversation Analysis and Language Alternation: Capturing transitions in the classroom | |Booktitle=Conversation Analysis and Language Alternation: Capturing transitions in the classroom | ||
| + | |Pages=35–58 | ||
|URL=https://benjamins.com/catalog/pbns.295.03gaf | |URL=https://benjamins.com/catalog/pbns.295.03gaf | ||
| − | |DOI= | + | |DOI=10.1075/pbns.295.03gaf |
|Abstract=Language alternation has been investigated from different perspectives. This chapter focuses on the conversation analytic perspective. This perspective divides into two models, namely the local order model and the overall order model. Formulating what appears to be opposite claims about the same object, these models may at first seem to be competing against each other. This chapter shows that, in CA, it is generally understood that the local order and the overall order need each other. Therefore, the chapter argues that the local order model and the overall order model of language alternation should not be seen as competing against each other. Instead the integration of the models is shown to be beneficial to the discipline as a whole. | |Abstract=Language alternation has been investigated from different perspectives. This chapter focuses on the conversation analytic perspective. This perspective divides into two models, namely the local order model and the overall order model. Formulating what appears to be opposite claims about the same object, these models may at first seem to be competing against each other. This chapter shows that, in CA, it is generally understood that the local order and the overall order need each other. Therefore, the chapter argues that the local order model and the overall order model of language alternation should not be seen as competing against each other. Instead the integration of the models is shown to be beneficial to the discipline as a whole. | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 06:17, 13 January 2020
| Garafanga2018 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | INCOLLECTION |
| Key | Garafanga2018 |
| Author(s) | Joseph Gafaranga |
| Title | Overall order versus local order in bilingual conversation: A conversation analytic perspective on language alternation |
| Editor(s) | Anna Filipi, Numa Markee |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, Bilingualism, Language alternation, Code-alternation, Overall structural organization, Preference, Transitions |
| Publisher | John Benjamins |
| Year | 2018 |
| Language | English |
| City | Amsterdam |
| Month | |
| Journal | |
| Volume | |
| Number | |
| Pages | 35–58 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1075/pbns.295.03gaf |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | Conversation Analysis and Language Alternation: Capturing transitions in the classroom |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
Language alternation has been investigated from different perspectives. This chapter focuses on the conversation analytic perspective. This perspective divides into two models, namely the local order model and the overall order model. Formulating what appears to be opposite claims about the same object, these models may at first seem to be competing against each other. This chapter shows that, in CA, it is generally understood that the local order and the overall order need each other. Therefore, the chapter argues that the local order model and the overall order model of language alternation should not be seen as competing against each other. Instead the integration of the models is shown to be beneficial to the discipline as a whole.
Notes
