Difference between revisions of "Weidner2013"
PaultenHave (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Matylda Weidner; |Title=‘This is how I see it’: No prefacing in Polish |Editor(s)=Nadine Thielemann; Peter Kosta; |Tag(s)=EMCA; conv...") |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{BibEntry | {{BibEntry | ||
| − | |BibType= | + | |BibType=INCOLLECTION |
|Author(s)=Matylda Weidner; | |Author(s)=Matylda Weidner; | ||
|Title=‘This is how I see it’: No prefacing in Polish | |Title=‘This is how I see it’: No prefacing in Polish | ||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
|Tag(s)=EMCA; conversation analysis; Polish; knowledge in interaction; doctor-patient interaction; particles | |Tag(s)=EMCA; conversation analysis; Polish; knowledge in interaction; doctor-patient interaction; particles | ||
|Key=Weidner2013 | |Key=Weidner2013 | ||
| − | |Publisher=John Benjamins | + | |Publisher=John Benjamins |
|Year=2013 | |Year=2013 | ||
|Language=English | |Language=English | ||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
|Pages=147–166 | |Pages=147–166 | ||
|URL=https://benjamins.com/catalog/ds.20.12weid | |URL=https://benjamins.com/catalog/ds.20.12weid | ||
| − | |DOI= | + | |DOI=10.1075/ds.20.12weid |
|Abstract=A number of conversation analytic studies have suggested that asymmetries of knowledge and access to knowledge and experience contribute to the organization of the interaction. Building on previous research on the epistemics of social relationships, this paper draws on audiotaped doctor-patient data and uses the methodology of conversation analysis to examine one practice for managing access to knowledge and dealing with issues related to epistemic status in Polish talk-in-interaction – no-prefacing. My analysis shows that turn-initial no in responsive turns takes from the local (sequential) context and the participants’ respective epistemic frames involved and becomes the participants’ resource for managing their socioepistemic relationships toward a collaborative, corroborative or competitive outcome. | |Abstract=A number of conversation analytic studies have suggested that asymmetries of knowledge and access to knowledge and experience contribute to the organization of the interaction. Building on previous research on the epistemics of social relationships, this paper draws on audiotaped doctor-patient data and uses the methodology of conversation analysis to examine one practice for managing access to knowledge and dealing with issues related to epistemic status in Polish talk-in-interaction – no-prefacing. My analysis shows that turn-initial no in responsive turns takes from the local (sequential) context and the participants’ respective epistemic frames involved and becomes the participants’ resource for managing their socioepistemic relationships toward a collaborative, corroborative or competitive outcome. | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 09:52, 1 December 2019
| Weidner2013 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | INCOLLECTION |
| Key | Weidner2013 |
| Author(s) | Matylda Weidner |
| Title | ‘This is how I see it’: No prefacing in Polish |
| Editor(s) | Nadine Thielemann, Peter Kosta |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, conversation analysis, Polish, knowledge in interaction, doctor-patient interaction, particles |
| Publisher | John Benjamins |
| Year | 2013 |
| Language | English |
| City | Amsterdam / Philadelphia |
| Month | |
| Journal | |
| Volume | |
| Number | |
| Pages | 147–166 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1075/ds.20.12weid |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | Approaches to Slavic Interaction |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
A number of conversation analytic studies have suggested that asymmetries of knowledge and access to knowledge and experience contribute to the organization of the interaction. Building on previous research on the epistemics of social relationships, this paper draws on audiotaped doctor-patient data and uses the methodology of conversation analysis to examine one practice for managing access to knowledge and dealing with issues related to epistemic status in Polish talk-in-interaction – no-prefacing. My analysis shows that turn-initial no in responsive turns takes from the local (sequential) context and the participants’ respective epistemic frames involved and becomes the participants’ resource for managing their socioepistemic relationships toward a collaborative, corroborative or competitive outcome.
Notes
