Difference between revisions of "Bovet2006a"
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) m |
|||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
|Year=2006 | |Year=2006 | ||
|Language=French | |Language=French | ||
| − | |||
|Journal=Mots | |Journal=Mots | ||
|Number=81 | |Number=81 | ||
Latest revision as of 12:55, 24 November 2019
| Bovet2006a | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Bovet2006a |
| Author(s) | Alain Bovet |
| Title | La constitution du public dans la démocratie semi-directe.Le cas de l'initiative populaire « pour une procréation respectant la dignité humaine » |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | democracy, ethnomethodology, media, pragmatism, public |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2006 |
| Language | French |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Mots |
| Volume | |
| Number | 81 |
| Pages | 35–48 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.4000/mots.650 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
En mars 2000, les citoyens suisses devaient se prononcer sur une initiative très restrictive sur la procréation médicalement assistée. L'analyse de l'ouverture d'un débat radiophonique consacré à cette question permet de documenter la façon dont un enjeu public est défini. En prenant appui sur la conception pragmatiste de John Dewey, une telle analyse permet de problématiser la constitution du public politique dans la démocratie semi-directe suisse.
In March 2000, the Swiss citizens were expected to vote for or against in vitro fertilization in a restrictive referendum. The opening of a radio debate is analysed in order to gather information about how the issue was defined as a public concern. Based on John Dewey's pragmatic approach, such analysis makes it possible to check out the making of a political audience in the Swiss semi-direct democracy.
Notes
