Difference between revisions of "Hutchby2018"
BogdanaHuma (talk | contribs) (BibTeX auto import 2018-09-11 10:52:02) |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{BibEntry | {{BibEntry | ||
| − | | | + | |BibType=ARTICLE |
| − | | | + | |Author(s)=Ian Hutchby; Alison Dart; |
|Title=‘Let’s check-in with our tummies’: Orienting to feelings-talk in group supervision for psychotherapy counsellors | |Title=‘Let’s check-in with our tummies’: Orienting to feelings-talk in group supervision for psychotherapy counsellors | ||
| − | |||
|Tag(s)=EMCA; Conversation Analysis; counselling; group supervision; feelings talk; overall structural organisation; sequential organisation; psychotherapy; institutional interaction; | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Conversation Analysis; counselling; group supervision; feelings talk; overall structural organisation; sequential organisation; psychotherapy; institutional interaction; | ||
| − | | | + | |Key=Hutchby2018 |
|Year=2018 | |Year=2018 | ||
| + | |Language=English | ||
|Journal=Discourse Studies | |Journal=Discourse Studies | ||
|Volume=20 | |Volume=20 | ||
|Number=5 | |Number=5 | ||
| − | |Pages= | + | |Pages=598–612 |
| − | |URL=https://doi | + | |URL=https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1461445618760600 |
|DOI=10.1177/1461445618760600 | |DOI=10.1177/1461445618760600 | ||
|Abstract=This article examines a particular kind of business-opening activity found in a specific, and little analysed, type of institutional group meeting: group supervision for psychotherapeutic counsellors. The data consist of a particular set of activities that occur in the initial stages of these meetings, which are neither the kind of pre-meeting talk identified by previous research on interaction in meetings, nor specifically the business of group supervision itself. This phase, referred to as the ‘check-in’, functions as an interim stage between small talk and getting down to business. The analysis shows how the check-in comprises a highly structured set of linguistic sequences whose production is bound up with one of the key interactional features of group supervision: the collaborative orientation to the production and relevance of ‘feelings-talk’. | |Abstract=This article examines a particular kind of business-opening activity found in a specific, and little analysed, type of institutional group meeting: group supervision for psychotherapeutic counsellors. The data consist of a particular set of activities that occur in the initial stages of these meetings, which are neither the kind of pre-meeting talk identified by previous research on interaction in meetings, nor specifically the business of group supervision itself. This phase, referred to as the ‘check-in’, functions as an interim stage between small talk and getting down to business. The analysis shows how the check-in comprises a highly structured set of linguistic sequences whose production is bound up with one of the key interactional features of group supervision: the collaborative orientation to the production and relevance of ‘feelings-talk’. | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 04:55, 13 January 2020
| Hutchby2018 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Hutchby2018 |
| Author(s) | Ian Hutchby, Alison Dart |
| Title | ‘Let’s check-in with our tummies’: Orienting to feelings-talk in group supervision for psychotherapy counsellors |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, Conversation Analysis, counselling, group supervision, feelings talk, overall structural organisation, sequential organisation, psychotherapy, institutional interaction |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2018 |
| Language | English |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Discourse Studies |
| Volume | 20 |
| Number | 5 |
| Pages | 598–612 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1177/1461445618760600 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
This article examines a particular kind of business-opening activity found in a specific, and little analysed, type of institutional group meeting: group supervision for psychotherapeutic counsellors. The data consist of a particular set of activities that occur in the initial stages of these meetings, which are neither the kind of pre-meeting talk identified by previous research on interaction in meetings, nor specifically the business of group supervision itself. This phase, referred to as the ‘check-in’, functions as an interim stage between small talk and getting down to business. The analysis shows how the check-in comprises a highly structured set of linguistic sequences whose production is bound up with one of the key interactional features of group supervision: the collaborative orientation to the production and relevance of ‘feelings-talk’.
Notes
