Difference between revisions of "Yip-Schoeb2020"

From emcawiki
Jump to: navigation, search
m
m (AndreiKorbut moved page Yip-Schoeb2018 to Yip-Schoeb2020 without leaving a redirect)
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
 
|Author(s)=Adrian Yip; Veronika Schoeb
 
|Author(s)=Adrian Yip; Veronika Schoeb
 
|Title=Facilitating patient participation in physiotherapy: Symptom-talk during exercise therapy from an Asian context
 
|Title=Facilitating patient participation in physiotherapy: Symptom-talk during exercise therapy from an Asian context
|Tag(s)=EMCA; Healthcare communication; Patient Participation; Health literacy; In Press; Medical EMCA
+
|Tag(s)=EMCA; Healthcare communication; Patient Participation; Health literacy; Medical EMCA
|Key=Yip-Schoeb2018
+
|Key=Yip-Schoeb2020
|Year=2018
+
|Year=2020
 
|Language=English
 
|Language=English
 
|Journal=Physiotherapy Theory and Practice: An International Journal of Physical Therapy
 
|Journal=Physiotherapy Theory and Practice: An International Journal of Physical Therapy
 +
|Volume=36
 +
|Number=2
 +
|Pages=291–306
 
|URL=https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09593985.2018.1485800
 
|URL=https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09593985.2018.1485800
|DOI=https://doi.org/10.1080/09593985.2018.1485800
+
|DOI=10.1080/09593985.2018.1485800
 
|Abstract=Background and purpose: Patient participation is the cornerstone for effective physiotherapy intervention. The aim was to analyze how patients and physiotherapists negotiate symptoms during exercise therapy and describe patients’ participation during this process. Methods: Nineteen consultations with sixteen patients and six physiotherapists were video-recorded in two Hong Kong outpatient settings. Conversation Analysis was used to uncover interactional aspects of symptom-talk, focusing on turn-taking, sequence organization, and vocabulary. Results: Physiotherapists explored patients’ symptoms only minimally and their frequent use of closed-ended questions allowed limited opportunity for participation. For patient-initiated symptom-talk, less than half elicited actions from physiotherapists, whose minimal acknowledgments were often accepted. Yet, some patients achieved a more substantial contribution through: (1) pausing the exercise-in-progress; (2) gazing at the physiotherapist; (3) pointing at the painful area; and (4) interrupting the physiotherapist, thereby challenging the social order. While discussion about symptoms was often initiated by physiotherapists, some patients participated actively by engaging in certain communicative strategies. Conclusions: Patient participation can be improved by physiotherapists offering a supportive environment (i.e., question design, responding to patients’ initiations, and promoting health literacy), and by patients embracing action-engendering communicative strategies. The fine details of interaction shed light onto the subtleties of symptom-talk initiated by patients or physiotherapists in physiotherapy.
 
|Abstract=Background and purpose: Patient participation is the cornerstone for effective physiotherapy intervention. The aim was to analyze how patients and physiotherapists negotiate symptoms during exercise therapy and describe patients’ participation during this process. Methods: Nineteen consultations with sixteen patients and six physiotherapists were video-recorded in two Hong Kong outpatient settings. Conversation Analysis was used to uncover interactional aspects of symptom-talk, focusing on turn-taking, sequence organization, and vocabulary. Results: Physiotherapists explored patients’ symptoms only minimally and their frequent use of closed-ended questions allowed limited opportunity for participation. For patient-initiated symptom-talk, less than half elicited actions from physiotherapists, whose minimal acknowledgments were often accepted. Yet, some patients achieved a more substantial contribution through: (1) pausing the exercise-in-progress; (2) gazing at the physiotherapist; (3) pointing at the painful area; and (4) interrupting the physiotherapist, thereby challenging the social order. While discussion about symptoms was often initiated by physiotherapists, some patients participated actively by engaging in certain communicative strategies. Conclusions: Patient participation can be improved by physiotherapists offering a supportive environment (i.e., question design, responding to patients’ initiations, and promoting health literacy), and by patients embracing action-engendering communicative strategies. The fine details of interaction shed light onto the subtleties of symptom-talk initiated by patients or physiotherapists in physiotherapy.
 
}}
 
}}

Latest revision as of 23:59, 21 April 2020

Yip-Schoeb2020
BibType ARTICLE
Key Yip-Schoeb2020
Author(s) Adrian Yip, Veronika Schoeb
Title Facilitating patient participation in physiotherapy: Symptom-talk during exercise therapy from an Asian context
Editor(s)
Tag(s) EMCA, Healthcare communication, Patient Participation, Health literacy, Medical EMCA
Publisher
Year 2020
Language English
City
Month
Journal Physiotherapy Theory and Practice: An International Journal of Physical Therapy
Volume 36
Number 2
Pages 291–306
URL Link
DOI 10.1080/09593985.2018.1485800
ISBN
Organization
Institution
School
Type
Edition
Series
Howpublished
Book title
Chapter

Download BibTex

Abstract

Background and purpose: Patient participation is the cornerstone for effective physiotherapy intervention. The aim was to analyze how patients and physiotherapists negotiate symptoms during exercise therapy and describe patients’ participation during this process. Methods: Nineteen consultations with sixteen patients and six physiotherapists were video-recorded in two Hong Kong outpatient settings. Conversation Analysis was used to uncover interactional aspects of symptom-talk, focusing on turn-taking, sequence organization, and vocabulary. Results: Physiotherapists explored patients’ symptoms only minimally and their frequent use of closed-ended questions allowed limited opportunity for participation. For patient-initiated symptom-talk, less than half elicited actions from physiotherapists, whose minimal acknowledgments were often accepted. Yet, some patients achieved a more substantial contribution through: (1) pausing the exercise-in-progress; (2) gazing at the physiotherapist; (3) pointing at the painful area; and (4) interrupting the physiotherapist, thereby challenging the social order. While discussion about symptoms was often initiated by physiotherapists, some patients participated actively by engaging in certain communicative strategies. Conclusions: Patient participation can be improved by physiotherapists offering a supportive environment (i.e., question design, responding to patients’ initiations, and promoting health literacy), and by patients embracing action-engendering communicative strategies. The fine details of interaction shed light onto the subtleties of symptom-talk initiated by patients or physiotherapists in physiotherapy.

Notes