Difference between revisions of "Heritage-Clayman2013"
PaultenHave (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=John Heritage; Steven E. Clayman; |Title=The changing tenor of questioning over time |Tag(s)=EMCA; assertive questioning; journalistic n...") |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
|Volume=7 | |Volume=7 | ||
|Number=4 | |Number=4 | ||
| − | |Pages= | + | |Pages=481–501 |
| + | |URL=https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/17512786.2013.802485 | ||
|DOI=10.1080/17512786.2013.802485 | |DOI=10.1080/17512786.2013.802485 | ||
| − | |Abstract=This paper uses a single question | + | |Abstract=This paper uses a single question form—the negative interrogative—as a window into the increasing aggressiveness of American journalists and hence the increasingly adversarial relationship between press and state in the United States. The negative interrogative in English is a type of yes/no interrogative (e.g., “Isn't it …”, “Don't you …”) often understood as asserting rather than merely seeking information. Its frequency in the construction of yes/no questions is an index of the propensity for journalists to depart from a formally neutral posture and express a point of view on the subject of inquiry. Previous quantitative research documented their growing use in US presidential news conferences since the 1950s, with the Nixon Administration as an historical turning point. Here we incorporate a more nuanced qualitative analysis of single cases in use. Beyond their growing frequency, negative interrogatives were increasingly mobilized to raise substantively adversarial matters, increasingly prefaced by adversarial assertions, and increasingly likely to treat such prefaces as presuppositionally given. Together these trends indicate journalists' growing willingness to highlight administration problems and failings and to hold Presidents to account, with Presidents since Nixon facing a harsher climate of journalistic questioning than did their predecessors. |
| − | increasing aggressiveness of American journalists and hence the increasingly adversarial | ||
| − | relationship between press and state in the United States. The negative interrogative in English | ||
| − | is a type of yes/no interrogative (e.g., | ||
| − | rather than merely seeking information. Its frequency in the construction of yes/no questions is an | ||
| − | index of the propensity for journalists to depart from a formally neutral posture and express a | ||
| − | point of view on the subject of inquiry. Previous quantitative research documented their growing | ||
| − | use in US presidential news conferences since the 1950s, with the Nixon Administration as an | ||
| − | historical turning point. Here we incorporate a more nuanced qualitative analysis of single cases | ||
| − | in use. Beyond their growing frequency, negative interrogatives were increasingly mobilized to | ||
| − | raise substantively adversarial matters, increasingly prefaced by adversarial assertions, and | ||
| − | increasingly likely to treat such prefaces as presuppositionally given. Together these trends | ||
| − | indicate | ||
| − | hold Presidents to account, with Presidents since Nixon facing a harsher climate of journalistic | ||
| − | questioning than did their predecessors. | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 03:37, 17 October 2019
| Heritage-Clayman2013 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Heritage-Clayman2013 |
| Author(s) | John Heritage, Steven E. Clayman |
| Title | The changing tenor of questioning over time |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, assertive questioning, journalistic norms, journalistic questioning, news conferences, negative interrogative, news interviews, press state relations, White House press corps |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2013 |
| Language | English |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Journalism Practice |
| Volume | 7 |
| Number | 4 |
| Pages | 481–501 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1080/17512786.2013.802485 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
This paper uses a single question form—the negative interrogative—as a window into the increasing aggressiveness of American journalists and hence the increasingly adversarial relationship between press and state in the United States. The negative interrogative in English is a type of yes/no interrogative (e.g., “Isn't it …”, “Don't you …”) often understood as asserting rather than merely seeking information. Its frequency in the construction of yes/no questions is an index of the propensity for journalists to depart from a formally neutral posture and express a point of view on the subject of inquiry. Previous quantitative research documented their growing use in US presidential news conferences since the 1950s, with the Nixon Administration as an historical turning point. Here we incorporate a more nuanced qualitative analysis of single cases in use. Beyond their growing frequency, negative interrogatives were increasingly mobilized to raise substantively adversarial matters, increasingly prefaced by adversarial assertions, and increasingly likely to treat such prefaces as presuppositionally given. Together these trends indicate journalists' growing willingness to highlight administration problems and failings and to hold Presidents to account, with Presidents since Nixon facing a harsher climate of journalistic questioning than did their predecessors.
Notes
