Difference between revisions of "Turowetz-Maynard2018"
m (change key to 2018) |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
|BibType=ARTICLE | |BibType=ARTICLE | ||
|Author(s)=Jason Turowetz; Douglas W. Maynard; | |Author(s)=Jason Turowetz; Douglas W. Maynard; | ||
| − | |Title=Narrative | + | |Title=Narrative methods for differential diagnosis in a case of autism |
|Tag(s)=EMCA; autism; sociology of diagnosis; narrative; conversation analysis | |Tag(s)=EMCA; autism; sociology of diagnosis; narrative; conversation analysis | ||
|Key=Turowetz-Maynard2018 | |Key=Turowetz-Maynard2018 | ||
| − | |Year= | + | |Year=2018 |
|Language=English | |Language=English | ||
|Journal=Symbolic Interaction | |Journal=Symbolic Interaction | ||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
|Number=3 | |Number=3 | ||
|Pages=357–383 | |Pages=357–383 | ||
| + | |URL=https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/symb.344 | ||
|DOI=10.1002/SYMB.344 | |DOI=10.1002/SYMB.344 | ||
| − | |Abstract=Diagnosis is rarely a straightforward process. This is especially so in | + | |Abstract=Diagnosis is rarely a straightforward process. This is especially so in psychiatry, where diagnoses are not based on organic biomarkers (e.g., blood tests). Diagnosis can be particularly complicated for children, whose symptoms must be disentangled from typical developmental processes. In this paper, we examine how clinicians use narrative as a method for differentiating a child's autism from a possible co‐morbid seizure disorder. Our approach is conversation analysis, and we show that narrative is a pervasive and endogenous practice for producing warrantable diagnostic knowledge about patients and, as such, forms part of what we term “the practical epistemology of clinical work.” |
| − | psychiatry, where diagnoses are not based on organic biomarkers (e.g., | ||
| − | blood tests). Diagnosis can be particularly complicated for children, | ||
| − | whose symptoms must be disentangled from typical developmental | ||
| − | processes. In this paper, we examine how clinicians use narrative as a | ||
| − | method for differentiating a | ||
| − | seizure disorder. Our approach is conversation analysis, and we show | ||
| − | that narrative is a pervasive and endogenous practice for producing | ||
| − | warrantable diagnostic knowledge about patients and, as such, forms | ||
| − | part of what we term “the practical epistemology of clinical work.” | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 04:58, 11 January 2020
| Turowetz-Maynard2018 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Turowetz-Maynard2018 |
| Author(s) | Jason Turowetz, Douglas W. Maynard |
| Title | Narrative methods for differential diagnosis in a case of autism |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, autism, sociology of diagnosis, narrative, conversation analysis |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2018 |
| Language | English |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Symbolic Interaction |
| Volume | 41 |
| Number | 3 |
| Pages | 357–383 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1002/SYMB.344 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
Diagnosis is rarely a straightforward process. This is especially so in psychiatry, where diagnoses are not based on organic biomarkers (e.g., blood tests). Diagnosis can be particularly complicated for children, whose symptoms must be disentangled from typical developmental processes. In this paper, we examine how clinicians use narrative as a method for differentiating a child's autism from a possible co‐morbid seizure disorder. Our approach is conversation analysis, and we show that narrative is a pervasive and endogenous practice for producing warrantable diagnostic knowledge about patients and, as such, forms part of what we term “the practical epistemology of clinical work.”
Notes
