Difference between revisions of "Potter2005a"
PaultenHave (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Jonathan Potter; |Title=Making psychology relevant |Tag(s)=categories; cognition; discursive psychology; institutions; social critique;...") |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{BibEntry | {{BibEntry | ||
|BibType=ARTICLE | |BibType=ARTICLE | ||
− | |Author(s)=Jonathan Potter; | + | |Author(s)=Jonathan Potter; |
|Title=Making psychology relevant | |Title=Making psychology relevant | ||
|Tag(s)=categories; cognition; discursive psychology; institutions; social critique; | |Tag(s)=categories; cognition; discursive psychology; institutions; social critique; | ||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
|Number=5 | |Number=5 | ||
|Pages=739–747 | |Pages=739–747 | ||
− | |DOI=10.1177/ 0957926505054944 | + | |URL=https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0957926505054944 |
− | |Abstract= This article describes some key features of a discursive | + | |DOI=10.1177/0957926505054944 |
− | psychological approach. In particular, discursive psychology is analytically | + | |Abstract=This article describes some key features of a discursive psychological approach. In particular, discursive psychology is analytically focused on the way psychological phenomena are practical, accountable, situated, embodied and displayed. It describes its particular version of constructionism and its distinctive approach to cognition as points of contrast with a range of other perspectives, including critical discourse analysis, sociolinguistics, ethnomethodology and conversation analysis. Finally, it describes three areas where discursive psychology is involved with social critique: work on categories and prejudice, issues to do with cognitivism and its problems, and work developing a discursive psychology of institutions. |
− | focused on the way psychological phenomena are practical, accountable, | ||
− | situated, embodied and displayed. It describes its particular version of | ||
− | constructionism and its distinctive approach to cognition as points of contrast | ||
− | with a range of other perspectives, including critical discourse analysis, | ||
− | sociolinguistics, ethnomethodology and conversation analysis. Finally, it | ||
− | describes three areas where discursive psychology is involved with social | ||
− | critique: work on categories and prejudice, issues to do with cognitivism and its | ||
− | problems, and work developing a discursive psychology of institutions. | ||
}} | }} |
Latest revision as of 10:02, 3 November 2019
Potter2005a | |
---|---|
BibType | ARTICLE |
Key | Potter2005a |
Author(s) | Jonathan Potter |
Title | Making psychology relevant |
Editor(s) | |
Tag(s) | categories, cognition, discursive psychology, institutions, social critique |
Publisher | |
Year | 2005 |
Language | English |
City | |
Month | |
Journal | Discourse & Society |
Volume | 16 |
Number | 5 |
Pages | 739–747 |
URL | Link |
DOI | 10.1177/0957926505054944 |
ISBN | |
Organization | |
Institution | |
School | |
Type | |
Edition | |
Series | |
Howpublished | |
Book title | |
Chapter |
Abstract
This article describes some key features of a discursive psychological approach. In particular, discursive psychology is analytically focused on the way psychological phenomena are practical, accountable, situated, embodied and displayed. It describes its particular version of constructionism and its distinctive approach to cognition as points of contrast with a range of other perspectives, including critical discourse analysis, sociolinguistics, ethnomethodology and conversation analysis. Finally, it describes three areas where discursive psychology is involved with social critique: work on categories and prejudice, issues to do with cognitivism and its problems, and work developing a discursive psychology of institutions.
Notes