Difference between revisions of "OReilly2014"

From emcawiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Blame and accountability in family therapy: Making sense of therapeutic spaces discursively |Title=Michelle O'Reilly |Key=OReilly2014 |Y...")
 
 
(4 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{BibEntry
 
{{BibEntry
 
|BibType=ARTICLE
 
|BibType=ARTICLE
|Author(s)=Blame and accountability in family therapy: Making sense of therapeutic spaces discursively
+
|Author(s)=Michelle O'Reilly
|Title=Michelle O'Reilly
+
|Title=Blame and accountability in family therapy: Making sense of therapeutic spaces discursively
 +
|Tag(s)=EMCA; Accountability;  Family Therapy;
 
|Key=OReilly2014
 
|Key=OReilly2014
 
|Year=2014
 
|Year=2014
Line 8: Line 9:
 
|Volume=1
 
|Volume=1
 
|Number=2
 
|Number=2
|Pages=163-177
+
|Pages=163–177
 +
|URL=https://psycnet.apa.org/doiLanding?doi=10.1037%2Fqup0000011
 
|DOI=10.1037/qup0000011
 
|DOI=10.1037/qup0000011
|Abstract=Within the context of family therapy a discursive social constructionist approach was utilized. This illustrated how parents drew upon culturally understood notions of mental health in order to situate the family’s issues within the identified child. Three core analytic issues were identified. First, it was found that parents attributed blame with the identified child. Second, they made direct appeals to the truthfulness of their accounts. Third, the therapist worked to reframe the difficulties as family problems. Thus, through an application of the discursive action model of Edwards and Potter (1992) the social actions and performative nature of family interactions were bound up with parental accountability and therapists moved to refocus the family in a way that maintained therapeutic alliances by offering praise, empathizing, and talking about “feelings.” In this way, a social constructionist, discursive account provided a mechanism for exploring how families interact within the therapeutic space and how child mental health is better understood as a negotiated, rather than fixed concept. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2014 APA, all rights reserved)
+
|Abstract=Within the context of family therapy a discursive social constructionist approach was utilized. This illustrated how parents drew upon culturally understood notions of mental health in order to situate the family’s issues within the identified child. Three core analytic issues were identified. First, it was found that parents attributed blame with the identified child. Second, they made direct appeals to the truthfulness of their accounts. Third, the therapist worked to reframe the difficulties as family problems. Thus, through an application of the discursive action model of Edwards and Potter (1992) the social actions and performative nature of family interactions were bound up with parental accountability and therapists moved to refocus the family in a way that maintained therapeutic alliances by offering praise, empathizing, and talking about “feelings.” In this way, a social constructionist, discursive account provided a mechanism for exploring how families interact within the therapeutic space and how child mental health is better understood as a negotiated, rather than fixed concept.
 
 
 
}}
 
}}

Latest revision as of 11:21, 7 December 2019

OReilly2014
BibType ARTICLE
Key OReilly2014
Author(s) Michelle O'Reilly
Title Blame and accountability in family therapy: Making sense of therapeutic spaces discursively
Editor(s)
Tag(s) EMCA, Accountability, Family Therapy
Publisher
Year 2014
Language
City
Month
Journal Qualitative Psychology
Volume 1
Number 2
Pages 163–177
URL Link
DOI 10.1037/qup0000011
ISBN
Organization
Institution
School
Type
Edition
Series
Howpublished
Book title
Chapter

Download BibTex

Abstract

Within the context of family therapy a discursive social constructionist approach was utilized. This illustrated how parents drew upon culturally understood notions of mental health in order to situate the family’s issues within the identified child. Three core analytic issues were identified. First, it was found that parents attributed blame with the identified child. Second, they made direct appeals to the truthfulness of their accounts. Third, the therapist worked to reframe the difficulties as family problems. Thus, through an application of the discursive action model of Edwards and Potter (1992) the social actions and performative nature of family interactions were bound up with parental accountability and therapists moved to refocus the family in a way that maintained therapeutic alliances by offering praise, empathizing, and talking about “feelings.” In this way, a social constructionist, discursive account provided a mechanism for exploring how families interact within the therapeutic space and how child mental health is better understood as a negotiated, rather than fixed concept.

Notes