Difference between revisions of "Waring-etal2013"
SaulAlbert (talk | contribs) m (Text replace - "Conversation analysis" to "Conversation Analysis") |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
|Journal=Learning, Culture and Social Interaction | |Journal=Learning, Culture and Social Interaction | ||
|Volume=2 | |Volume=2 | ||
− | |Pages= | + | |Number=4 |
− | | | + | |Pages=249–264 |
− | |Abstract=Research on vocabulary teaching and learning has formulated a rich knowledge base for | + | |URL=https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S2210656113000573 |
− | understanding both what a vocabulary explanation should entail and how it can be conducted. Relatively lacking is a detailed description of how explanation is managed when vocabulary items arise spontaneously in the ongoing | + | |DOI=10.1016/j.lcsi.2013.08.001 |
− | using either the analytic or the animated approach.While the former engages predominantly verbal | + | |Abstract=Research on vocabulary teaching and learning has formulated a rich knowledge base for understanding both what a vocabulary explanation should entail and how it can be conducted. Relatively lacking is a detailed description of how explanation is managed when vocabulary items arise spontaneously in the ongoing classroom interaction. Based on a two-hour videotaped adult ESL (English as a Second Language) class co-taught by two teachers, we offer such a description within a conversation analytic framework. In particular, we show how the teachers explain the vocabulary using either the analytic or the animated approach. While the former engages predominantly verbal and textual resources, the latter activates an ensemble of multimodal means such as gestures, environmentally couple gestures, and scene enactment. Findings of this study contribute to the existing literature with some much needed specifications of the “technology” of vocabulary explanations. |
− | and textual resources, the latter activates an ensemble of multimodal means such as gestures, | ||
− | environmentally couple gestures, and scene enactment. Findings of this study contribute to the | ||
− | existing literature with some much needed specifications of the “technology” of vocabulary | ||
− | explanations. | ||
}} | }} |
Latest revision as of 09:51, 1 December 2019
Waring-etal2013 | |
---|---|
BibType | ARTICLE |
Key | Waring-etal2013 |
Author(s) | Hansun Zhang Waring, Sarah Chepkirui Creider, Catherine DiFelice Box |
Title | Explaining vocabulary in the second language classroom: A conversation analytic account |
Editor(s) | |
Tag(s) | EMCA, Conversation Analysis, Classroom discourse, Vocabulary teaching and learning, Explanation, Nonverbal resources |
Publisher | |
Year | 2013 |
Language | English |
City | |
Month | |
Journal | Learning, Culture and Social Interaction |
Volume | 2 |
Number | 4 |
Pages | 249–264 |
URL | Link |
DOI | 10.1016/j.lcsi.2013.08.001 |
ISBN | |
Organization | |
Institution | |
School | |
Type | |
Edition | |
Series | |
Howpublished | |
Book title | |
Chapter |
Abstract
Research on vocabulary teaching and learning has formulated a rich knowledge base for understanding both what a vocabulary explanation should entail and how it can be conducted. Relatively lacking is a detailed description of how explanation is managed when vocabulary items arise spontaneously in the ongoing classroom interaction. Based on a two-hour videotaped adult ESL (English as a Second Language) class co-taught by two teachers, we offer such a description within a conversation analytic framework. In particular, we show how the teachers explain the vocabulary using either the analytic or the animated approach. While the former engages predominantly verbal and textual resources, the latter activates an ensemble of multimodal means such as gestures, environmentally couple gestures, and scene enactment. Findings of this study contribute to the existing literature with some much needed specifications of the “technology” of vocabulary explanations.
Notes