Difference between revisions of "Tanaka2005"
SaulAlbert (talk | contribs) m (Text replace - "Conversation analysis" to "Conversation Analysis") |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{BibEntry | {{BibEntry | ||
|BibType=ARTICLE | |BibType=ARTICLE | ||
| − | |Author(s)=Hiroko Tanaka; | + | |Author(s)=Hiroko Tanaka; |
| − | |Title=Grammar and the | + | |Title=Grammar and the “timing” of social action: word order and preference organization in Japanese |
| − | Japanese | ||
|Tag(s)=EMCA; Conversation Analysis; grammar and interaction; Japanese grammar; preference; ellipsis; word order; canonical word order; projectability; | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Conversation Analysis; grammar and interaction; Japanese grammar; preference; ellipsis; word order; canonical word order; projectability; | ||
|Key=Tanaka2005 | |Key=Tanaka2005 | ||
| Line 10: | Line 9: | ||
|Volume=34 | |Volume=34 | ||
|Number=3 | |Number=3 | ||
| − | |Pages= | + | |Pages=389–430 |
| − | |URL= | + | |URL=https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/language-in-society/article/grammar-and-the-timing-of-social-action-word-order-and-preference-organization-in-japanese/42B1E2685D9070256D88829EEEE94353 |
|DOI=10.1017/S0047404505050141 | |DOI=10.1017/S0047404505050141 | ||
| − | |Abstract= This article explores the interconnection between grammar and the | + | |Abstract=This article explores the interconnection between grammar and the performance of preferred and dispreferred responses in Japanese. As is well known, dispreferred format turns are structurally more complex than preferred format turns, regularly delayed, accompanied by prefaces and accounts, mitigated, or made indirect. Owing to the flexibility of Japanese grammar, participants have expanded intra-turn capacity to maximize or minimize compliance with such formats. On one extreme, a dispreferred action can be massively delayed until near the turn-ending through opting for so-called canonical predicate-final word order and minimization of ellipsis. On the other extreme, a preferred action can be expedited to the very opening of a turn through non-canonical predicate-initial word order by taking advantage of word order variability and ellipsis. Such syntactic practices are interactionally managed for calibrating the timing of social action. It emerges that the canonical word order – assumed to be the generically unmarked alternative – is actually optimally tailored for the implementation of marked (dispreferred) responses, as opposed to a non-canonical word order for unmarked (preferred) responses, in the given sequential environment. |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 10:31, 3 November 2019
| Tanaka2005 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Tanaka2005 |
| Author(s) | Hiroko Tanaka |
| Title | Grammar and the “timing” of social action: word order and preference organization in Japanese |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, Conversation Analysis, grammar and interaction, Japanese grammar, preference, ellipsis, word order, canonical word order, projectability |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2005 |
| Language | |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Language in Society |
| Volume | 34 |
| Number | 3 |
| Pages | 389–430 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1017/S0047404505050141 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
This article explores the interconnection between grammar and the performance of preferred and dispreferred responses in Japanese. As is well known, dispreferred format turns are structurally more complex than preferred format turns, regularly delayed, accompanied by prefaces and accounts, mitigated, or made indirect. Owing to the flexibility of Japanese grammar, participants have expanded intra-turn capacity to maximize or minimize compliance with such formats. On one extreme, a dispreferred action can be massively delayed until near the turn-ending through opting for so-called canonical predicate-final word order and minimization of ellipsis. On the other extreme, a preferred action can be expedited to the very opening of a turn through non-canonical predicate-initial word order by taking advantage of word order variability and ellipsis. Such syntactic practices are interactionally managed for calibrating the timing of social action. It emerges that the canonical word order – assumed to be the generically unmarked alternative – is actually optimally tailored for the implementation of marked (dispreferred) responses, as opposed to a non-canonical word order for unmarked (preferred) responses, in the given sequential environment.
Notes
