Difference between revisions of "Berger2011"

Latest revision as of 04:13, 12 August 2020

Berger2011
BibType	ARTICLE
Key	Berger2011
Author(s)	Israel Berger
Title	Support and evidence for considering local contingencies in studying and transcribing silence in conversation
Editor(s)
Tag(s)	EMCA, Silence, Pause, Gap, Lapse, Conversation Analysis, Transcription, Preference, Sequence organisation, Turn taking
Publisher
Year	2011
Language
City
Month
Journal	Pragmatics
Volume	21
Number	3
Pages	411–430
URL	Link
DOI	10.1075/prag.21.3.01ber
ISBN
Organization
Institution
School
Type
Edition
Series
Howpublished
Book title
Chapter

Abstract

Notes

@@ Line 9: / Line 9: @@
 |Volume=21
 |Number=3
-|Pages=411-430
+|Pages=411–430
-|URL=http://elanguage.net/journals/pragmatics/article/view/3645
+|URL=https://www.jbe-platform.com/content/journals/10.1075/prag.21.3.01ber
-|Abstract=Using a conversation analytic methodology, this report looks at conversations in English in which lengthy silences are regularly present. These silences are treated as unproblematic in this corpus. They apparently deviate from the proposals that gaps are minimized (Sacks, Schegloff, & Jefferson 1974) and that there is a standard maximum silence of one second (Jefferson, 1988). This is discussed in light of context and
+|DOI=10.1075/prag.21.3.01ber
-culture. Then the robustness of some features of the organisation of sequences (Schegloff 2007) and turn-taking (Sacks, Schegloff, & Jefferson 1974) are considered. Finally, solutions are compared for rendering lengthy silences in such a way that their meaning is preserved in conversation analytic transcripts or others that include timed silences.
 }}