Difference between revisions of "Smithson2005"
SaulAlbert (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Janet Smithson; Elizabeth H. Stokoe; |Title=Discourses of work-life balance: Negotiating "gender blind" terms in organizations |Key=Smi...") |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) m |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{BibEntry | {{BibEntry | ||
|BibType=ARTICLE | |BibType=ARTICLE | ||
| − | |Author(s)=Janet Smithson; Elizabeth H. Stokoe; | + | |Author(s)=Janet Smithson; Elizabeth H. Stokoe; |
| − | |Title=Discourses of work-life balance | + | |Title=Discourses of Work–Life Balance: Negotiating “Genderblind” Terms in Organizations |
| + | |Tag(s)=Discursive Psychology; work-life balance; diversity; gender; organizations | ||
|Key=Smithson2005 | |Key=Smithson2005 | ||
|Year=2005 | |Year=2005 | ||
| Line 8: | Line 9: | ||
|Volume=12 | |Volume=12 | ||
|Number=2 | |Number=2 | ||
| − | |Pages= | + | |Pages=147–168 |
| + | |URL=http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1468-0432.2005.00267.x/abstract | ||
| + | |DOI=10.1111/j.1468-0432.2005.00267.x | ||
| + | |Abstract=This article examines current debates about gender equality, work-life balance and flexible working. We contrast policymakers’ and organizational discourses of flexible working and work–life balance with managers’ and employees’ talk about these issues within their organizations. We show how, despite the increasingly gender-neutral language of the official discourses, in the data studied participants consistently reformulate the debates around gendered explanations and assumptions. For example, a ‘generic female parent’ is constructed in relation to work–life balance and flexible working yet participants routinely maintain that gender makes no difference within their organization. We consider the effects of these accounts; specifically the effect on those who take up flexible working, and the perceived backlash against policies viewed as favouring women or parents. We argue that the location of work–life balance and flexibility debates within a gender-neutral context can in practice result in maintaining or encouraging gendered practices within organizations. Implications of this for organizations, for policymakers and for feminist researchers are discussed. | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 10:16, 16 February 2016
| Smithson2005 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Smithson2005 |
| Author(s) | Janet Smithson, Elizabeth H. Stokoe |
| Title | Discourses of Work–Life Balance: Negotiating “Genderblind” Terms in Organizations |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | Discursive Psychology, work-life balance, diversity, gender, organizations |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2005 |
| Language | |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Gender, Work & Organization |
| Volume | 12 |
| Number | 2 |
| Pages | 147–168 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1111/j.1468-0432.2005.00267.x |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
This article examines current debates about gender equality, work-life balance and flexible working. We contrast policymakers’ and organizational discourses of flexible working and work–life balance with managers’ and employees’ talk about these issues within their organizations. We show how, despite the increasingly gender-neutral language of the official discourses, in the data studied participants consistently reformulate the debates around gendered explanations and assumptions. For example, a ‘generic female parent’ is constructed in relation to work–life balance and flexible working yet participants routinely maintain that gender makes no difference within their organization. We consider the effects of these accounts; specifically the effect on those who take up flexible working, and the perceived backlash against policies viewed as favouring women or parents. We argue that the location of work–life balance and flexibility debates within a gender-neutral context can in practice result in maintaining or encouraging gendered practices within organizations. Implications of this for organizations, for policymakers and for feminist researchers are discussed.
Notes
