Difference between revisions of "Hama1999"
JakubMlynar (talk | contribs) (first name and surname swapped (in Authors field); correction of URL; addition of DOI link) |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
|Journal=Human Studies | |Journal=Human Studies | ||
|Volume=22 | |Volume=22 | ||
| + | |Number=2-4 | ||
|Pages=183-192 | |Pages=183-192 | ||
|URL=https://link.springer.com/article/10.1023/A:1005436400730 | |URL=https://link.springer.com/article/10.1023/A:1005436400730 | ||
| − | |DOI= | + | |DOI=10.1023/A:1005436400730 |
|Abstract=In his doctoral dissertation, Harold Garfinkel critically examined Talcott Parsons' classical formulation of the problem of order referred to as the “Hobbesian problem”. Garfinkel's criticism can be summarized under the following three headings: (1) common sense rationality replaces scientific rationality; (2) the level of the premises of conduct replaces the level of de facto action; (3) congruence theory replaces the correspondence theory. The aim of this paper is to make some observations on the structure of the problem of order which Garfinkel discovered through this criticism. I propose to call it the “Rashomon problem” after Akira Kurosawa's film Rashomon. Ethnomethodology can be regarded as an attempt to solve the “Rashomon problem”. | |Abstract=In his doctoral dissertation, Harold Garfinkel critically examined Talcott Parsons' classical formulation of the problem of order referred to as the “Hobbesian problem”. Garfinkel's criticism can be summarized under the following three headings: (1) common sense rationality replaces scientific rationality; (2) the level of the premises of conduct replaces the level of de facto action; (3) congruence theory replaces the correspondence theory. The aim of this paper is to make some observations on the structure of the problem of order which Garfinkel discovered through this criticism. I propose to call it the “Rashomon problem” after Akira Kurosawa's film Rashomon. Ethnomethodology can be regarded as an attempt to solve the “Rashomon problem”. | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 05:22, 19 October 2019
| Hama1999 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Hama1999 |
| Author(s) | Hideo Hama |
| Title | Ethnomethodology and the Rashomon problem |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, Ethnomethodology, Intersubjectivity, Breaching Experiment, Trust, Problem of Order |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 1999 |
| Language | English |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Human Studies |
| Volume | 22 |
| Number | 2-4 |
| Pages | 183-192 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1023/A:1005436400730 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
In his doctoral dissertation, Harold Garfinkel critically examined Talcott Parsons' classical formulation of the problem of order referred to as the “Hobbesian problem”. Garfinkel's criticism can be summarized under the following three headings: (1) common sense rationality replaces scientific rationality; (2) the level of the premises of conduct replaces the level of de facto action; (3) congruence theory replaces the correspondence theory. The aim of this paper is to make some observations on the structure of the problem of order which Garfinkel discovered through this criticism. I propose to call it the “Rashomon problem” after Akira Kurosawa's film Rashomon. Ethnomethodology can be regarded as an attempt to solve the “Rashomon problem”.
Notes
