Difference between revisions of "Lehtinen2009b"

From emcawiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Esa Lehtinen; |Title=Sequential and inferential order in religious action : A conversation analytic perspective |Tag(s)=EMCA; Sequentia...")
 
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{BibEntry
 
{{BibEntry
 
|BibType=ARTICLE
 
|BibType=ARTICLE
|Author(s)=Esa Lehtinen;  
+
|Author(s)=Esa Lehtinen;
|Title=Sequential and inferential order in religious action : A conversation analytic perspective
+
|Title=Sequential and inferential order in religious action: a conversation analytic perspective
 
|Tag(s)=EMCA; Sequential organization; Religion; Membership categorization; Seventh-day Adventism;
 
|Tag(s)=EMCA; Sequential organization; Religion; Membership categorization; Seventh-day Adventism;
 
|Key=Lehtinen2009b
 
|Key=Lehtinen2009b
Line 8: Line 8:
 
|Language=English
 
|Language=English
 
|Journal=Langage et société
 
|Journal=Langage et société
|Volume=130
+
|Number=4(130)
|Number=4
+
|Pages=15–36
|Pages=15-36
+
|URL=https://www.cairn.info/revue-langage-et-societe-2009-4-page-15.htm
 
|DOI=10.3917/ls.130.0015
 
|DOI=10.3917/ls.130.0015
 +
|Abstract=This article is a conversation analytic study of religious interaction. The data consist of audio-recordings of Seventh-day Adventist Bible study in a Finnish congregation. The study shows how religious interaction is related to the inferential and sequential order of interaction. Inferential order is analyzed through examining how the Bible study participants use and rely on categorical knowledge when they describe the events of biblical stories. They use expressions that tie the biblical stories to categories that are relevant in the participants’ world. Sequential order is analyzed through showing how the categorizations are constrained by the sequential organization of the Bible study. Much of the Bible study is organized into question–answer–comment sequences. In their answers the participants design their answers to fit the question, and in the comment the ‘teacher’ of the Bible study can evaluate the answer. Through the practices analyzed in the article the Bible study participants accomplish the situated task of finding how a particular passage of the Bible is relevant and applicable in their own lives, how it ‘speaks’ to them.
 
}}
 
}}

Latest revision as of 10:24, 23 November 2019

Lehtinen2009b
BibType ARTICLE
Key Lehtinen2009b
Author(s) Esa Lehtinen
Title Sequential and inferential order in religious action: a conversation analytic perspective
Editor(s)
Tag(s) EMCA, Sequential organization, Religion, Membership categorization, Seventh-day Adventism
Publisher
Year 2009
Language English
City
Month
Journal Langage et société
Volume
Number 4(130)
Pages 15–36
URL Link
DOI 10.3917/ls.130.0015
ISBN
Organization
Institution
School
Type
Edition
Series
Howpublished
Book title
Chapter

Download BibTex

Abstract

This article is a conversation analytic study of religious interaction. The data consist of audio-recordings of Seventh-day Adventist Bible study in a Finnish congregation. The study shows how religious interaction is related to the inferential and sequential order of interaction. Inferential order is analyzed through examining how the Bible study participants use and rely on categorical knowledge when they describe the events of biblical stories. They use expressions that tie the biblical stories to categories that are relevant in the participants’ world. Sequential order is analyzed through showing how the categorizations are constrained by the sequential organization of the Bible study. Much of the Bible study is organized into question–answer–comment sequences. In their answers the participants design their answers to fit the question, and in the comment the ‘teacher’ of the Bible study can evaluate the answer. Through the practices analyzed in the article the Bible study participants accomplish the situated task of finding how a particular passage of the Bible is relevant and applicable in their own lives, how it ‘speaks’ to them.

Notes