Difference between revisions of "Paoletti2014a"

From emcawiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Isabella Paoletti; |Title=Ethics and the social dimension of research activities |Tag(s)=EMCA; |Key=Paoletti2014a |Year=2014 |Journal=...")
 
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{BibEntry
 
{{BibEntry
 
|BibType=ARTICLE
 
|BibType=ARTICLE
|Author(s)=Isabella Paoletti;  
+
|Author(s)=Isabella Paoletti;
 
|Title=Ethics and the social dimension of research activities
 
|Title=Ethics and the social dimension of research activities
|Tag(s)=EMCA;  
+
|Tag(s)=EMCA; Ethics; Informed consent; Anonymity; Ethnography; Data management
 
|Key=Paoletti2014a
 
|Key=Paoletti2014a
 
|Year=2014
 
|Year=2014
 +
|Language=English
 
|Journal=Human Studies
 
|Journal=Human Studies
 
|Volume=37
 
|Volume=37
 
|Number=2
 
|Number=2
|Pages=257-277
+
|Pages=257–277
 +
|URL=https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10746-013-9299-4
 +
|DOI=10.1007/s10746-013-9299-4
 +
|Abstract=This study identifies some of the ethical issues that arise in the everyday practice of researching in collecting interactional data. A form of conceptualizing ethics in research is proposed as awareness of the social dimension of research practices and their transformative nature. The collection of ethnographic data—including interviewing, observing, audiovisual recording, and other methods—is achieved by means of social interactions that necessarily imply issues of face, relevance, appropriateness, politeness, and identity, to name a few. Research activities have an impact on both the setting and the participants in the study, in fact, they become part of the setting studied. At times, participants may be using the research activity for their own ends. It is important for researchers to be aware of and responsible for the impact they have on the setting under study. Some ethical problems encountered conducting actual research activities are discussed as an illustration: issues related to negotiation of consent in semipublic settings and to the protection of informants’ anonymity. The actual resolution of these problems is presented as research findings from the everyday practice of doing research. Systematic reflection on the social and interactional dimension of how ethical decisions are taken during actual research activities could make legislation on the protection of research participants and ethical guidelines more realistic and useful.
 
}}
 
}}

Latest revision as of 05:47, 25 March 2021

Paoletti2014a
BibType ARTICLE
Key Paoletti2014a
Author(s) Isabella Paoletti
Title Ethics and the social dimension of research activities
Editor(s)
Tag(s) EMCA, Ethics, Informed consent, Anonymity, Ethnography, Data management
Publisher
Year 2014
Language English
City
Month
Journal Human Studies
Volume 37
Number 2
Pages 257–277
URL Link
DOI 10.1007/s10746-013-9299-4
ISBN
Organization
Institution
School
Type
Edition
Series
Howpublished
Book title
Chapter

Download BibTex

Abstract

This study identifies some of the ethical issues that arise in the everyday practice of researching in collecting interactional data. A form of conceptualizing ethics in research is proposed as awareness of the social dimension of research practices and their transformative nature. The collection of ethnographic data—including interviewing, observing, audiovisual recording, and other methods—is achieved by means of social interactions that necessarily imply issues of face, relevance, appropriateness, politeness, and identity, to name a few. Research activities have an impact on both the setting and the participants in the study, in fact, they become part of the setting studied. At times, participants may be using the research activity for their own ends. It is important for researchers to be aware of and responsible for the impact they have on the setting under study. Some ethical problems encountered conducting actual research activities are discussed as an illustration: issues related to negotiation of consent in semipublic settings and to the protection of informants’ anonymity. The actual resolution of these problems is presented as research findings from the everyday practice of doing research. Systematic reflection on the social and interactional dimension of how ethical decisions are taken during actual research activities could make legislation on the protection of research participants and ethical guidelines more realistic and useful.

Notes